Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24613097›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine2014

Evaluation of an intervention among adolescents to reduce preventive misconception in HIV vaccine clinical trials.

Michelle Lally, Richard Goldsworthy, Moussa Sarr, Jessica Kahn, Larry Brown, Ligia Peralta, Gregory Zimet

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. ". . . I've Gone Through This My Own Self, So I Practice What I Preach . . . ".Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE · 2016
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Michelle LallyAlpert Medical School of Brown University and the Lifespan Hospital System, Providence, Rhode Island. Electronic address: mlally@lifespan.org.
Richard GoldsworthyAcademic Edge, Bloomington, Indiana.
Moussa SarrWestat, Rockville, Maryland.
Jessica KahnUniversity of Cincinnati College of Medicine and Cincinnati Children's Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Larry BrownAlpert Medical School of Brown University and the Lifespan Hospital System, Providence, Rhode Island.
Ligia PeraltaUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Gregory ZimetIndiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.

Funding

Adol. Medicine Trials Network for HIV/AIDS InterventionsU01HD040474 · NICHD · WESTAT, INC. · PI HARRIS, DONALD ROBERT · 2001 to 2016
$114.4M
LEADERSHIP GROUP FOR ADOLESCENT MEDICINE TRIALS NETWORKU01HD040533 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI WILSON, CRAIG M · 2001 to 2016
$76.4M
NICHD NIH HHS U01 HD040474NICHD NIH HHS U01 HD040533
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePlacebo and randomization are important concepts that must be understood before youth can safely participate in HIV vaccine studies or other biomedical trials for HIV prevention. These concepts are central to the phenomenon of preventive misconception that may be associated with an increase in risk behavior among study participants related to mistaken beliefs. Persuasive messaging, traditionally used in the field of marketing, could enhance educational efforts associated with randomized clinical trials.

methodsTwo educational brochures were designed to increase knowledge about HIV vaccine clinical trials via one- and two-sided persuasive messaging. Through the Adolescent Medicine Trials Network, 120 youth were enrolled, administered a mock HIV vaccine trial consent, and then randomized to receive either no supplemental information or one of the two brochures.

resultsThe two-sided brochure group in which common clinical trial misconceptions were acknowledged and then refuted had significantly higher scores on knowledge of randomization and interpretation of side effects than the consent-only control group, and the willingness to participate in an HIV vaccine trial was not decreased with the use of this brochure.

conclusionTwo-sided persuasive messaging improves understanding of the concepts of randomization and placebo among youth who would consider participating in an HIV vaccine trial. Further evaluation of this approach should be considered for at-risk youth participating in an actual trial of a biomedical intervention for HIV prevention.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeTherapeutic MisconceptionAdolescentAdolescent BehaviorAge FactorsAIDS VaccinesAnalysis of VarianceFemaleHealth EducationHIV InfectionsHumansMalePatient Acceptance of Health CarePatient CompliancePreventive MedicineProgram EvaluationAIDS VaccinesAdolescent clinical trialsAdolescentsHIVHIV vaccine trialsPreventive misconception

Identifiers

PMID24613097
PMCPMC4108563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.