Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24613038›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of antimicrobial agents2014

Treatment and prophylaxis of melioidosis.

David Dance

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of antimicrobial agents, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 169 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
169citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
13.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

169 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 315 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Genetic Engineering of Lysogenic-Lytic Switch Genes ImprovesInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

109 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 2 countries.

David DanceLao-Oxford-Mahosot Hospital-Wellcome Trust Research Unit (LOMWRU), Microbiology Laboratory, Mahosot Hospital, Vientiane, Lao People's Democratic Republic; Centre for Tropical Medicine, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. Electronic address: david.d@tropmedres.ac.
Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Melioidosis, infection with Burkholderia pseudomallei, is being recognised with increasing frequency and is probably more common than currently appreciated. Treatment recommendations are based on a series of clinical trials conducted in Thailand over the past 25 years. Treatment is usually divided into two phases: in the first, or acute phase, parenteral drugs are given for ≥10 days with the aim of preventing death from overwhelming sepsis; in the second, or eradication phase, oral drugs are given, usually to complete a total of 20 weeks, with the aim of preventing relapse. Specific treatment for individual patients needs to be tailored according to clinical manifestations and response, and there remain many unanswered questions. Some patients with very mild infections can probably be cured by oral agents alone. Ceftazidime is the mainstay of acute-phase treatment, with carbapenems reserved for severe infections or treatment failures and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (co-amoxiclav) as second-line therapy. Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (co-trimoxazole) is preferred for the eradication phase, with the alternative of co-amoxiclav. In addition, the best available supportive care is needed, along with drainage of abscesses whenever possible. Treatment for melioidosis is unaffordable for many in endemic areas of the developing world, but the relative costs have reduced over the past decade. Unfortunately there is no likelihood of any new or cheaper options becoming available in the immediate future. Recommendations for prophylaxis following exposure to B. pseudomallei have been made, but the evidence suggests that they would probably only delay rather than prevent the development of infection.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAmoxicillin-Potassium Clavulanate CombinationAnti-Bacterial AgentsBurkholderia pseudomalleiCarbapenemsCeftazidimeClavulanic AcidDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialDrug Therapy, CombinationHumansInfusions, ParenteralMelioidosisSulfamethoxazoleTrimethoprimAmoxicillin-Potassium Clavulanate CombinationAnti-Bacterial AgentsCarbapenemsCeftazidimeClavulanic AcidSulfamethoxazoleTrimethoprimAntibioticsBurkholderia pseudomalleiMelioidosisProphylaxisTreatment

Identifiers

PMID24613038
PMCPMC4236584
OpenAlexW2097732208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.