Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24612659›Full record

Trial reportEuropean urology2015

Combination treatment with mirabegron and solifenacin in patients with overactive bladder: efficacy and safety results from a randomised, double-blind, dose-ranging, phase 2 study (Symphony).

Paul Abrams, Con Kelleher, David Staskin, Tomasz Rechberger, Richard Kay, Reynaldo Martina, Donald Newgreen, Asha Paireddy, Rob van Maanen, Arwin Ridder

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIComparative StudyMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European urology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01340027 (A Randomized, Double-Blind, Factorial, Parallel-Group, Active and Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Dose-Ranging Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Six Dose Combinations of Solifenacin Succinate and Mirabegron Compared to Mirabegron and Solifenacin Succinate Monotherapies in the Treatment of Overactive Bladder.), which is not on this map. Cited by 72 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
27.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01340027 phase2completednot on this map

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Factorial, Parallel-Group, Active and Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Dose-Ranging Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Six Dose Combinations of Solifenacin Succinate and Mirabegron Compared to Mirabegron and Solifenacin Succinate Monotherapies in the Treatment of Overactive Bladder.

TypeinterventionalSponsorAstellas Pharma Europe B.V.Ran2011 to 2012Enrolled1,307ConditionsUrologic Diseases, Urinary Bladder Diseases, Urological Manifestations, Signs and SymptomsArmsMirabegron, Solifenacin succinate, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 244 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Mirabegron and Anticholinergics in the Treatment of Overactive Bladder Syndrome: A Meta-analysis.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2023
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Paul AbramsBristol Urological Institute, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK. Electronic address: paul.abrams@bui.ac.uk.
Con KelleherGuys and St Thomas' Hospitals, London, UK.
David StaskinTufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Tomasz RechbergerII Department of Gynaecology, Medical University, Lublin, Poland.
Richard KayRK Statistics Ltd., Bakewell, UK.
Reynaldo MartinaAstellas Pharma BV, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Donald NewgreenAstellas Pharma BV, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Asha PaireddyAstellas Pharma BV, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Rob van MaanenAstellas Pharma BV, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Arwin RidderAstellas Pharma BV, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Astellas Pharma (Netherlands) · NLMedical University of Lublin · PLSouthmead Hospital · GBSt Thomas' Hospital · GBTufts University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCombining the β3-adrenoceptor agonist mirabegron and the antimuscarinic (AM) agent solifenacin may improve efficacy in the treatment of overactive bladder (OAB) while reducing the AM side effects.

objectiveThe primary objective was to evaluate the efficacy of combinations of solifenacin/mirabegron compared with solifenacin 5mg monotherapy. The secondary objective was to explore the dose-response relationship and the safety/tolerability compared with placebo and monotherapy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsA phase 2, factorial design, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo- and monotherapy-controlled trial, conducted at 141 sites in 20 European countries. Male and female patients were aged ≥18 yr with symptoms of OAB for ≥3 mo.

interventionA total of 1306 patients (66.4% female) were randomised to 12 wk of treatment in 1 of 12 groups: 6 combination groups (solifenacin 2.5, 5, or 10 mg plus mirabegron 25 or 50 mg), 5 monotherapy groups (solifenacin 2.5, 5, or 10 mg, or mirabegron 25 or 50 mg), or placebo. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Change from baseline to end of treatment in mean volume voided per micturition (MVV) (primary end point) and mean numbers of micturitions per 24 h, incontinence episodes per 24 h, and urgency episodes per 24 h were analysed using an analysis of covariance model. Safety assessments included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), blood pressure, pulse rate, postvoid residual (PVR) volume, and laboratory and electrocardiography (ECG) parameters. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Compared with solifenacin 5 mg monotherapy, all combinations with solifenacin 5 or 10 mg significantly improved MVV, with adjusted differences ranging from 18.0 ml (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.4-30.0) to 26.3 ml (95% CI, 12.0-41.0). Three combination groups significantly reduced micturition frequency compared with solifenacin 5 mg, ranging from -0.80 (95% CI, -1.39 to -0.22) to -0.98 (95% CI, -1.68 to -0.27). Five of six combinations significantly reduced urgency episodes compared with solifenacin 5 mg, ranging from -0.98 (95% CI, -1.78, to -0.18) to -1.37 (95% CI, -2.03 to -0.70). No dose-related trends in TEAEs, blood pressure, pulse rate, PVR volume, or laboratory or ECG parameters were observed between combination and monotherapy groups, although the incidence of constipation was slightly increased with combination therapy.

conclusionsCombination therapy with solifenacin/mirabegron significantly improved MVV, micturition frequency, and urgency compared with solifenacin 5 mg monotherapy. All combinations were well tolerated, with no important additional safety findings compared with monotherapy or placebo. PATIENT SUMMARY: To improve treatment of overactive bladder (OAB), mirabegron/solifenacin in combination was compared with each drug alone and placebo. Combination therapy improved OAB symptoms and had similar safety and acceptability.

trial registrationClinical trials.gov: NCT01340027.

Indexed as

AcetanilidesAdrenergic beta-3 Receptor AgonistsAdultAgedDouble-Blind MethodDrug CombinationsEuropeFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMuscarinic AntagonistsSolifenacin SuccinateThiazolesTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeAcetanilidesAdrenergic beta-3 Receptor AgonistsDrug CombinationsmirabegronMuscarinic AntagonistsSolifenacin SuccinateThiazolesUrological AgentsCombination therapyMirabegronOveractive bladderSolifenacin

Identifiers

PMID24612659
OpenAlexW2128421946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.