Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24612441›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2015

How do patients respond when confronted with telephone access barriers to care?

Sara M Locatelli, Sherri L LaVela, Mary E Talbot, Michael L Davies

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. What Humans Need.Annals of family medicine
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sara M LocatelliCenter of Innovation for Complex Chronic Healthcare (CINCCH), Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA), Edward Hines Jr. VA Hospital, Hines, IL, USA.
Sherri L LaVelaCenter of Innovation for Complex Chronic Healthcare (CINCCH), Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA), Edward Hines Jr. VA Hospital, Hines, IL, USA.
Mary E TalbotCenter of Innovation for Complex Chronic Healthcare (CINCCH), Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA), Edward Hines Jr. VA Hospital, Hines, IL, USA.
Michael L DaviesOffice of Systems Redesign, Veterans Affairs Central Office, Washington, DC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo gain an in-depth understanding of patient barriers to accessing telephone care, subsequent responses to telephone access issues and recommendations for system improvement within a large integrated health-care system. STUDY

designCross-sectional qualitative focus group study.

methodsOne focus group was conducted at each of 17 Veterans Affairs facilities with a total of 123 Veteran users of VA health care. All facilities followed a focus group discussion guide, and purposively sampled patients receiving care at their VA facility in primary and/or specialty care. Focus groups' recordings were sent to the authors' independent evaluation centre, transcribed verbatim and analysed using qualitative content analysis methodology.

resultsParticipants described many issues with the phone system that resulted in delays to care needs being addressed, including difficulty getting someone to answer the phone, out-dated phone directories, frequent disconnections and incorrect transfers. Participants most frequently responded to access issues by doing nothing or waiting to contact at a later time, or seeking unscheduled in-person care in the emergency department or primary care clinic. Participants offered recommendations for improving telephone care, including access to direct extensions, and upgrades to the telephone system.

conclusionsTelephone access issues could result in increased patient harm and/or increased wait times for in-person primary care or emergency services. Periodic evaluation of telephone systems is necessary to ensure telephone systems adequately meet patient needs while using resources efficiently to optimize the delivery of high quality, safe health care.

Indexed as

Patient SatisfactionAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFocus GroupsHealth Services AccessibilityHealth Services Needs and DemandHospitals, VeteransHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrimary Health CareQualitative ResearchQuality of Health CareTelephonehealth services accessibilitytelephone hotlinesVeterans

Identifiers

PMID24612441
PMCPMC5810725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.