Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24611995›Full record

SynthesisHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2015

Patient participation in clinical encounters: a systematic review to identify self-report measures.

Brian Mavis, Margaret Holmes Rovner, Sarah Jorgenson, John Coffey, Nandita Anand, Emi Bulica, Carolyn Marie Gaulden, Jacob Peacock, Alycia Ernst

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. How to routinely collect data on patient-reported outcome and experience measures in renal registries in Europe: an expert consensus meeting.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2015
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The personalized medicine discourse: archaeology and genealogy.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2021
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Brian MavisOffice of Medical Education Research and Development, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Margaret Holmes RovnerCenter for Ethics and Humanities in the Life Sciences, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Sarah JorgensonCenter for Advancing Health, Washington, DC, USA.
John CoffeyMichigan State University Libraries, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Nandita AnandCollege of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Emi BulicaCollege of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Carolyn Marie GauldenCollege of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Jacob PeacockCollege of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Alycia ErnstCollege of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is evidence suggesting that active participation of patients in their health care can improve the quality of care and decrease health-care costs. Further, patient reports of their health-care experience are increasingly used to monitor health-care quality.

objectiveThis paper describes a systematic review of peer-reviewed studies to identify measures of patients' active participation in their encounters with health-care providers.

methodsA systematic literature review was conducted for publications indexed from 1975 to 2011. Of interest were self-reported measures of patient participation that were not limited to a specific health concern. All abstracts were reviewed independently by two authors, and the full paper was considered for those meeting inclusion criteria. MAIN

resultsFrom a review of 4528 citations, ten measures were identified. The approaches to development of the measures varied considerably, as did their study samples and their psychometric quality. DISCUSSION: These measures represented three conceptual frameworks: empowerment and self-efficacy, therapeutic alliance, and consumerism/satisfaction. They provide a more comprehensive perspective of patients' experiences of their provider encounters, and a better understanding patient behaviour enhanced the quality of health-care delivery or improved health outcomes. These measures underscore the continuing challenge of defining patient participation and the multiple theoretical approaches that underlie this form of patient behaviour.

conclusionsCurrent interest in quality-related physician report cards gives significant weight to patients' self-reported experiences as one dimension of physician performance. It is critical to identify the specific focus and quality of measures selected for this and research purposes.

Indexed as

Patient ParticipationQuality of Health CareSelf ReportHumansPhysician-Patient RelationsSelf Efficacypatient involvementpatient participationquestionnairereview

Identifiers

PMID24611995
PMCPMC5810645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.