Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24611837›Full record

ArticleExperimental and clinical psychopharmacology2014

Heavy drinking and the role of inhibitory control of attention.

Walter Roberts, Melissa A Miller, Jessica Weafer, Mark T Fillmore

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Effect of menstrual cycle on rewarding properties of alcohol cues in women.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. ADHD, impulsivity and alcohol abuse: methods, results, and implications.Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Walter RobertsDepartment of Psychology, University of Kentucky.
Melissa A MillerDepartment of Psychology, University of Kentucky.
Jessica WeaferDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Chicago.
Mark T FillmoreDepartment of Psychology, University of Kentucky.

Funding

Re-Engineering Translational Research at the University of ChicagoUL1TR000430 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI SOLWAY, JULIAN · 2012 to 2016
$20.2M
RESEARCH TRAINING IN DRUG ABUSE BEHAVIORT32DA007304 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI RUSH, CRAIG R · 1998 to 2012
$3.1M
Alcohol Tolerance and Behavioral Disinhibition in HumansR01AA018274 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI FILLMORE, MARK T · 2009 to 2013
$1.5M
Mechanisms of Alcohol Tolerance and Priming in HumansR01AA012895 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI FILLMORE, MARK T · 2001 to 2009
$1.4M
Alcohol Sensitivity and Abuse Potential in ADHDF31AA018584 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI WEAFER, JESSICA J · 2009 to 2011
$88k
Redundant Signal Effect and Alcohol Impairment of Behavioral Inhibition in ADHDF31AA021028 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI MILLER, MELISSA A · 2012 to 2013
$66k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000430NIAAA NIH HHS F31 AA018584NIAAA NIH HHS F31 AA021028NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA012895NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA018274NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA007304
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alcohol can disrupt goal-directed behavior by impairing the ability to inhibit attentional shifts toward salient but goal-irrelevant stimuli. Individuals who are highly sensitive to this effect of the drug may be at increased risk for problematic drinking, especially among those whose attention is drawn to alcohol-related cues in the environment (i.e., attentional bias). The current study examined the acute impairing effect of alcohol on inhibitory mechanisms of attentional control in a group of healthy social drinkers. We then examined whether increased sensitivity to this disinhibiting effect of alcohol was associated with heavy drinking, especially among those who have an attentional bias toward alcohol-related stimuli. Eighty nondependent social drinkers performed a delayed ocular response task that measured their inhibitory control of attention by their ability to suppress attentional shifts to irrelevant stimuli. Attentional bias was measured using a visual probe task. Inhibitory control was assessed following a moderate dose of alcohol (0.64 g/kg) and a placebo. Participants made more inhibitory failures (i.e., premature saccades) following 0.64 g/kg alcohol compared with placebo and the relation of this effect to their drinking habits did depend on the level of the drinker's attentional bias to alcohol-related stimuli. Among drinkers with higher attentional bias, greater impairment of inhibitory control was associated with heavier drinking. In contrast, drinkers with little or no attentional bias showed no relation between their sensitivity to the disinhibiting effects of alcohol and drinking habits. These findings have implications for understanding how heightened incentive-salience of alcohol cues and impaired attentional control can interactively contribute to excessive alcohol use.

Indexed as

AttentionAdultAlcoholismFemaleHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID24611837
PMCPMC4082663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.