Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24611583›Full record

ArticleJournal of proteome research2014

Intelligent data acquisition blends targeted and discovery methods.

Derek J Bailey, Molly T McDevitt, Michael S Westphall, David J Pagliarini, Joshua J Coon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of proteome research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Derek J BaileyDepartment of Chemistry, University of Wisconsin - Madison , 1101 Unviersity Avenue, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, United States.
Molly T McDevitt
Michael S Westphall
David J Pagliarini
Joshua J Coon

Funding

GRADUATE TRAINING IN MOLECULAR BIOSCIENCEST32GM007215 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI HULL, CHRISTINA M · 1985 to 2018
$22.5M
The Epigenotype of Human ES CellsP01GM081629 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI THOMSON, JAMES ALEXANDER · 2008 to 2012
$8.9M
Regulation of Mitochondrial Metabolism by Post-Translational ModificationsR01DK098672 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI David J Pagliarini · 2013 to 2026
$4.8M
NIDDK NIH HHS DK098672NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK098672NIGMS NIH HHS GM081629NIGMS NIH HHS P01 GM081629NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007215NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM07215
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A mass spectrometry (MS) method is described here that can reproducibly identify hundreds of peptides across multiple experiments. The method uses intelligent data acquisition to precisely target peptides while simultaneously identifying thousands of other, nontargeted peptides in a single nano-LC-MS/MS experiment. We introduce an online peptide elution order alignment algorithm that targets peptides based on their relative elution order, eliminating the need for retention-time-based scheduling. We have applied this method to target 500 mouse peptides across six technical replicate nano-LC-MS/MS experiments and were able to identify 440 of these in all six, compared with only 256 peptides using data-dependent acquisition (DDA). A total of 3757 other peptides were also identified within the same experiment, illustrating that this hybrid method does not eliminate the novel discovery advantages of DDA. The method was also tested on a set of mice in biological quadruplicate and increased the number of identified target peptides in all four mice by over 80% (826 vs 459) compared with the standard DDA method. We envision real-time data analysis as a powerful tool to improve the quality and reproducibility of proteomic data sets.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceAlgorithmsAnimalsChromatography, LiquidMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLPeptide FragmentsProteinsProteomicsReproducibility of ResultsTandem Mass SpectrometryPeptide FragmentsProteins

Identifiers

PMID24611583
PMCPMC3983381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.