ArticleThe Analyst2014
Viral plaque analysis on a wide field-of-view, time-lapse, on-chip imaging platform.
Article in The Analyst, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Video microscopy: an old story with a bright biological future.Biomedical engineering online · 2025Review
- Simple Imaging System for Label-Free Identification of Bacterial Pathogens in Resource-Limited Settings.International journal of biomedical imaging · 2024Article
- Development of a high-speed imaging system for real time evaluation and monitoring of cardiac engineered tissues.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Article
- Microfluidics on lensless, semiconductor optical image sensors: challenges and opportunities for democratization of biosensing at the micro-and nano-scale.Nanophotonics (Berlin, Germany) · 2023Review
- Cost-efficient boundary-free surface patterning achieves high effective-throughput of time-lapse microscopy experiments.PloS one · 2022Article
- Oncolytic herpes simplex virus and temozolomide synergistically inhibit breast cancer cell tumorigenesisOncology letters · 2021Article
- Phage susceptibility testing and infectious titer determination through wide-field lensless monitoring of phage plaque growth.PloS one · 2021Article
- Real-time bacterial microcolony counting using on-chip microscopy.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Compact Wireless Microscope for In-Situ Time Course Study of Large Scale Cell Dynamics within an Incubator.Scientific reports · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The observation of viral plaques is the standard method for determining the viral titer and understanding the behaviors of viruses. Here, we report the application of a wide field-of-view (FOV), time-lapse, on-chip imaging platform, termed the ePetri, for plaque analysis of murine norovirus 1 (MNV-1). The ePetri offers the ability to dynamically track plaques at the individual cell death event level over a wide FOV of 6 mm × 4 mm. As demonstration, we captured high-resolution time-lapse images of MNV-1-infected cells at 30 min intervals. We implemented a customized image-processing program containing a density-based clustering algorithm to analyze the spatial-temporal distribution of cell death events to identify plaques at their earliest stages. By using the results in a viral titer count format, we showed that our approach gives results that are comparable to conventional plaque assays. We further showed that the extra information collected by the ePetri can be used to monitor the dynamics of plaque formation and growth. Finally, we performed a demonstration experiment to show the relevance of such an experimental format for viral inhibitor study. We believe the ePetri is a simple and compact solution for the automation of viral plaque assays, plaque behavior analysis, and antiviral drug discovery and study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.