ArticlePersonalized medicine2013
Clinical application of targeted and genome-wide technologies: can we predict treatment responses in chronic lymphocytic leukemia?
Article in Personalized medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- An overview of remote monitoring methods in biodiversity conservation.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022Review
- Using Genomic Information to Guide Ibrutinib Treatment Decisions in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.PharmacoEconomics · 2017Article
- Patients' Preferences for Genomic Diagnostic Testing in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia: A Discrete Choice Experiment.The patient · 2016Article
- CpG Oligonucleotide and Interleukin 2 stimulation enables higher cytogenetic abnormality detection rates than 12-o-tetradecanolyphorbol-13-acetate in Asian patients with B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (B-CLL).International journal of hematology · 2014Article
- High-definition reconstruction of clonal composition in cancer.Cell reports · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is low-grade lymphoma of mature B cells and it is considered to be the most common type of hematological malignancy in the western world. CLL is characterized by a chronically relapsing course and clinical and biological heterogeneity. Many patients do not require any treatment for years. Although important progress has been made in the treatment of CLL, none of the conventional treatment options are curative. Recurrent chromosomal abnormalities have been identified and are associated with prognosis and pathogenesis of the disease. More recently, unbiased genome-wide technologies have identified multiple additional recurrent aberrations. The precise predictive value of these has not been established, but it is likely that the genetic heterogeneity observed at least partly reflects the clinical variability. The present article reviews our current knowledge of predictive markers in CLL using whole-genome technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.