Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24610705›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2014

Odds of death after glioblastoma diagnosis in the United States by chemotherapeutic era.

Mitchell S Wachtel, Shengping Yang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Improved survival for elderly married glioblastoma patients : Better treatment delivery, less toxicity, and fewer disease complications.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2016
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Hippocampal EUD in primarily irradiated glioblastoma patients.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2014
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mitchell S WachtelDepartment of Pathology and Cancer Center, School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, Texas.
Shengping Yang
Texas Tech University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bevacizumab (BZM) and temozolomide (TMZ) have been shown to be beneficial in the treatment of patients with glioblastoma. We sought evidence for the benefit of BZM in the general patient population at large. The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER database was queried for patients diagnosed with glioblastoma between 2000 and 2009, divided into a pre-TMZ era (January 2000-June 2003), a transitional era (July 2003-March 2005), a TMZ era (April 2005-October 2007), and a BZM-TMZ era (November 2007-December 2009). Binomial logit regression analyzed odds of death, taking into account age at diagnosis, tumor size, gender, race, marital status, radiotherapy, and extensive surgery. Compared with the pre-TMZ era, odds of death were decreased in the TMZ era by 12% (97.5% CI [confidence interval] 3-20%) 6 months after diagnosis and 36% (30-42%) a year after diagnosis; corresponding values for BZM-TMZ were 31% (24-37%) and 50% (45-55%). For era comparisons, decreases in odds of death were larger at 12 than 6 months; the opposite was true for extensive surgery and radiotherapy (P < 0.025, Wald χ(2) test, for each analysis). For both 6 and 12 month comparisons, odds of death in the BZM-TMZ era were lower than in the TMZ era (P < 0.025, Wald χ(2) test, for each analysis). The results provide evidence that TMZ positively impacted survival of glioblastoma patients and that the addition of BZM further improved survival, this lends support to the addition of BZM to the chemotherapeutic armamentarium. Evaluation of odds of death is an attractive alternative to Cox regression when proportional hazards assumptions are violated and follow-up is good.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBevacizumabBrain NeoplasmsCombined Modality TherapyDacarbazineFemaleGlioblastomaHumansMaleMiddle AgedProportional Hazards ModelsTemozolomideAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBevacizumabDacarbazineTemozolomideBevacizumabglioblastomaodds of deathpopulation databaseSEERtemozolomide

Identifiers

PMID24610705
PMCPMC4101757
OpenAlexW1966679242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.