ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2014
Evaluating user experiences of the secure messaging tool on the Veterans Affairs' patient portal system.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01382186 (Veterans' Experiences Using Secure Messaging on MyHealtheVet), which is not on this map. Cited by 91 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Veterans' Experiences Using Secure Messaging on MyHealtheVet
Who cites it
91 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Quantifying Patient Portal Use: Systematic Review of Utilization Metrics.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Pooled it
- What Do Patients and Caregivers Want? A Systematic Review of User Suggestions to Improve Patient Portals.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2020Pooled it
- Barriers, Facilitators, and Solutions to Optimal Patient Portal and Personal Health Record Use: A Systematic Review of the Literature.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2017Pooled it
- Patient and provider attitudes toward the use of patient portals for the management of chronic disease: a systematic review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2015Pooled it
- The effect of patient portals on quality outcomes and its implications to meaningful use: a systematic review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2015Pooled it
- Trial
- Evaluating the efficacy of NoteAid on EHR note comprehension among US Veterans through Amazon Mechanical Turk.International journal of medical informatics · 2023Trial
- Impact of Patient-Clinical Team Secure Messaging on Communication Patterns and Patient Experience: Randomized Encouragement Design Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Trial
- Barriers and Enablers to Asynchronous Secure Messaging Use in Hospital-Based Ambulatory Specialty Clinics in Ontario, Canada: Convergent Mixed Methods Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- The Role of Measurement in Identifying High-Intensity Secure Message Senders Among Older Adults: Observational Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Observational
- A scoping review of studies on secure messaging through patient portals: persistent challenges and potential solutions.npj health systems · 2026Article
- Super Users' Reported Best Practices for Coordinating Proactive Integrated Use of Virtual Health Care Resources: Prospective Concurrent Mixed Methods Human-Centered Design Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Medication Management for Older Adults in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Narrative Review.Aging medicine (Milton (N.S.W)) · 2025Review
- Measurement, drivers, and outcomes of patient-initiated secure messaging use and intensity: a scoping review.JAMIA open · 2025Review
- A systematic review of early evidence on generative AI for drafting responses to patient messages.npj health systems · 2025Article
- Patient-Health Care Professional Communication via a Secure Web-Based Portal in Severe Mental Health Conditions: Qualitative Analysis of Secure Messages.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Engaging Patients with Headache in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA): ACTIvated Veterans Engagement Group (ACTIVE) to Improve Delivery of Patient-Centered Headache Services.Journal of patient experience · 2025Article
- Developing Evidence to Support Policy: Protocol for the StrAtegic PoLicy EvIdence-Based Evaluation CeNTer (SALIENT).JMIR research protocols · 2024Article
- Improving Veteran Engagement with Virtual Care Technologies: a Veterans Health Administration State of the Art Conference Research Agenda.Journal of general internal medicine · 2024Review
- A Computationally-guided Qualitative Analysis to Understand User Experiences with Different Types of Mobile Personal Health Records.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2024Article
31 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe United States Department of Veterans Affairs has implemented an electronic asynchronous "Secure Messaging" tool within a Web-based patient portal (ie, My HealtheVet) to support patient-provider communication. This electronic resource promotes continuous and coordinated patient-centered care, but to date little research has evaluated patients' experiences and preferences for using Secure Messaging.
objectiveThe objectives of this mixed-methods study were to (1) characterize veterans' experiences using Secure Messaging in the My HealtheVet portal over a 3-month period, including system usability, (2) identify barriers to and facilitators of use, and (3) describe strategies to support veterans' use of Secure Messaging.
methodsWe recruited 33 veterans who had access to and had previously used the portal's Secure Messaging tool. We used a combination of in-depth interviews, face-to-face user-testing, review of transmitted secure messages between veterans and staff, and telephone interviews three months following initial contact. We assessed participants' computer and health literacy during initial and follow-up interviews. We used a content-analysis approach to identify dominant themes in the qualitative data. We compared inferences from each of the data sources (interviews, user-testing, and message review) to identify convergent and divergent data trends.
resultsThe majority of veterans (27/33, 82%) reported being satisfied with Secure Messaging at initial interview; satisfaction ratings increased to 97% (31/32, 1 missing) during follow-up interviews. Veterans noted Secure Messaging to be useful for communicating with their primary care team to manage health care needs (eg, health-related questions, test requests and results, medication refills and questions, managing appointments). Four domains emerged from interviews: (1) perceived benefits of using Secure Messaging, (2) barriers to using Secure Messaging, (3) facilitators for using Secure Messaging, and (4) suggestions for improving Secure Messaging. Veterans identified and demonstrated impediments to successful system usage that can be addressed with education, skill building, and system modifications. Analysis of secure message content data provided insights to reasons for use that were not disclosed by participants during interviews, specifically sensitive health topics such as erectile dysfunction and sexually transmitted disease inquiries.
conclusionsVeterans perceive Secure Messaging in the My HealtheVet patient portal as a useful tool for communicating with health care teams. However, to maximize sustained utilization of Secure Messaging, marketing, education, skill building, and system modifications are needed. Data from this study can inform a large-scale quantitative assessment of Secure Messaging users' experiences in a representative sample to validate qualitative findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.