SynthesisMolecular biology reports2014
Role of p16 gene promoter methylation in gastric carcinogenesis: a meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Molecular biology reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- High CpG island methylation of p16 gene and loss of p16 protein expression associate with the development and progression of tetralogy of Fallot.Journal of genetics · 2016Article
- Implications of Genetic and Epigenetic Alterations of CDKN2A (p16(INK4a)) in Cancer.EBioMedicine · 2016Review
- Gastric Carcinogenesis and Underlying Molecular Mechanisms: Helicobacter pylori and Novel Targeted Therapy.BioMed research international · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2015-08-18Compromised Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the relationships between promoter DNA methylation in tumor suppressor gene p16 and gastric carcinogenesis. The PubMed, CISCOM, CINAHL, Web of Science, Google Scholar, EBSCO, Cochrane Library and CBM databases were searched for relevant articles published before November 1st, 2013 without any language restrictions. Meta-analysis was conducted using the STATA 12.0 software. Crude odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated. Forty-seven clinical cohort studies that met all inclusion criteria were included in this meta-analysis. A total of 2,813 gastric cancer (GC) patients were assessed. Our meta-analysis results revealed that the frequencies of p16 promoter methylation in the GC tissues were higher than those of normal and adjacent tissues (Normal: OR = 23.04, 95% CI = 13.55-39.15, P < 0.001; Adjacent: OR = 4.42, 95% CI = 1.66-11.76, P = 0.003; respectively). Furthermore, we observed significant associations of p16 promoter methylation with TNM stage, histologic grade, invasive grade, lymph node metastasis of GC (TNM stage: OR = 3.60, 95% CI: 2.17-5.98, P < 0.001; Histologic grade: OR = 2.63, 95% CI: 1.55-4.45, P < 0.001; Invasive grade: OR = 3.44, 95% CI: 1.68-7.06, P = 0.001; Lymph node metastasis: OR = 2.68, 95% CI: 1.66-4.32, P < 0.001; respectively). However, there were no correlations of p16 promoter methylation with the TNM stage and Helicobacter pylori (HP) infection of GC (Tumor size: OR = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.14-4.07, P = 0.746; HP infection: OR = 1.31, 95% CI: 0.75-2.27, P = 0.342; respectively). Our findings provide empirical evidence that p16 promoter methylation may play an important role in gastric carcinogenesis. Thus, p16 promoter methylation may be a promising potential biomarker for the early diagnosis of GC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.