Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24610331›Full record

ArticleNeurology2014

Natalizumab to fingolimod washout in patients at risk of PML: when good intentions yield bad outcomes.

Gavin Giovannoni, Robert T Naismith

Abstract readEditorialComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Gavin GiovannoniFrom the Queen Mary University of London (G.G.), Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK; and the Department of Neurology (R.T.N.), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.
Robert T Naismith
Queen Mary University of London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With more choices for multiple sclerosis (MS) disease-modifying therapies, data are urgently required to support clinical decisions regarding safe transitioning and sequencing of therapies. With more than 7 years of clinical experience, natalizumab has been confirmed as highly effective in reducing MS disease activity. However, natalizumab carries a risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML),(1) with more than 400 cases of natalizumab-related PML to date.(2) Because 2 of the 3 initial natalizumab-associated PML cases were on the combination natalizumab plus interferon, the concern was that combining agents led to a heightened risk of infectious complications. In these early times, uncertainty revolved around 2 points: the theoretical risk of PML if natalizumab was transiently combined with another immune-altering agent and the value of transiently "reconstituting" CNS immune surveillance by washout of natalizumab in an effort to clear theoretical subclinical JC virus within the CNS.(3) The optimal length of natalizumab washout became the subject of intense consternation and debate, with no clear guidelines to inform practice. However, upon withdrawing natalizumab, resumption of disease activity was soon observed, beginning 3-4 months after the last dose of natalizumab.(4-10) Postnatalizumab return of disease raised concern that the washout may harm the patient by a severe relapse with incomplete recovery.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedFemaleFingolimod HydrochlorideHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsMaleMultiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-RemittingNatalizumabPropylene GlycolsSphingosineAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedFingolimod HydrochlorideImmunosuppressive AgentsNatalizumabPropylene GlycolsSphingosine

Identifiers

PMID24610331
OpenAlexW2125905200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.