Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24610168›Full record

ArticleInternational archives of occupational and environmental health2015

Longitudinal changes in hearing threshold levels of noise-exposed construction workers.

Monique C J Leensen, Wouter A Dreschler

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International archives of occupational and environmental health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Noise Exposure History and Age-Related Changes to Hearing.JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Occupation and 20-year hearing decline: findings from The HUNT Study.Occupational medicine (Oxford, England) · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Longitudinal changes in hearing threshold levels for noise-exposed military personnel.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Monique C J LeensenClinical and Experimental Audiology, ENT Department, Academic Medical Centre (AMC), P.O. Box 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, m.c.leensen@amc.nl.
Wouter A Dreschler
Academic Medical Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLongitudinal analysis of audiometric data of a large population of noise-exposed workers provides insight into the development of noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) as a function of noise exposure and age, particularly during the first decade of noise exposure.

methodsData of pure-tone audiometry of 17,930 construction workers who underwent periodic occupational hearing screening at least twice during a 4-year period were available for analysis. These concerned all follow-up measurements of the baseline cohort described by Leensen et al. (Int Arch Occup Environ Health 84:577-590, 2011). Linear mixed models explored the relationship between the annual rate of change in hearing and noise exposure level, exposure duration, and age. Data of 3,111 workers who were tested on three occasions were used to investigate the pattern of hearing loss development.

resultsThe mean annual deterioration in hearing in this study population was 0.54 dB/yr, and this became larger with increasing noise exposure level and increasing age. Remarkably, during the first decade of noise exposure, an improvement in hearing threshold levels (HTLs) was observed. The change in hearing over three measurements showed a concave development of hearing loss as a function of time, which corresponds to NIHL development.

conclusionsOverall, hearing deteriorated over the measurement period. Because HTLs at follow-up were better than those obtained at baseline, no statement can be made about the NIHL development during the first decade of noise exposure. This improvement in HTLs rather resembles the result of measurement variation in occupational screening audiometry than an actual improvement in hearing ability.

Indexed as

Auditory ThresholdConstruction IndustryOccupational ExposureAdolescentAdultAge FactorsAudiometry, Pure-ToneHearing Loss, Noise-InducedHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedNoise, OccupationalOccupational DiseasesRetrospective StudiesTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID24610168
OpenAlexW2060967357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.