Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24610085›Full record

ArticleHNO2014

[Universal newborn hearing screening : Definition of uniform parameters by the Association of German Hearing Screening Centers as a requirement for nationwide evaluation with valid results].

I Brockow, M Praetorius, K Neumann, A am Zehnhoff-Dinnesen, K Mohnike, P Matulat, K Rohlfs, R Lang-Roth, M Gross, E Duphorn and 10 more

Abstract readEvaluation StudyValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in HNO, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. [Newborn hearing screening in Germany-results of the 2011/2012 and 2017/2018 evaluations].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2023
    Article
  2. Hearing Screening Marginalized.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2023
    Article
  3. The Newborn Hearing Screening Programme in Germany.International journal of neonatal screening · 2018
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

I BrockowScreeningzentrum, Bayerisches Landesamt für Gesundheit und Lebensmittelsicherheit, Veterinärstr. 2, 85764, Oberschleißheim, Deutschland, Inken.brockow@lgl.bayern.de.
M Praetorius
K Neumann
A am Zehnhoff-Dinnesen
K Mohnike
P Matulat
K Rohlfs
R Lang-Roth
M Gross
E Duphorn
S Meuret
A Seidel
R Schönfeld
R Schönweiler
S Dienlin
A Rissmann
I Friedrich
B Lehnert
U Nennstiel-Ratzel
VDHZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSince 2009, all newborns in Germany have been entitled to universal neonatal hearing screening (UNHS). UNHS with tracking of test results leads to earlier detection of hearing disorders. The Association of German Hearing Screening Centers (Verband Deutscher Hörscreening-Zentralen, VDHZ) was founded to promote nationwide tracking, validity and quality control of UNHS results.

objectivesA comparable data structure in the different screening centers, with uniform definitions of primary parameters is essential for the nationwide evaluation of UNHS results. To address the question of whether a data structure with comparable definitions already exists or still has to be created, the existing structures and primary parameter definitions in the hearing screening centers should be investigated and compared.

methodsA survey was conducted in all hearing screening centers to assess how data on the primary UNHS parameters defined in pediatric guidelines was gathered. In the case of discrepancies, uniform definitions were created. Finally, the practicability of these definitions was evaluated.

resultsDue to differing definitions of primary parameters, some of the data were not comparable between the individual centers. Therefore, uniform definitions were created in a consensus process. In the centers, the screening method, the two-step first screening and the result of the first screening now correspond to these uniform definitions. Other parameters, e.g. the total number of newborns, still vary widely, rendering the comparison of screening rates almost impossible.

conclusionValid evaluation of UNHS not only requires nationwide establishment of hearing screening centers, but also unified data structures and parameter definitions.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicTerminology as TopicAudiologyFemaleGermanyHearing DisordersHearing TestsHumansInfant, NewbornMaleMass ScreeningNeonatal ScreeningOtolaryngology

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.