Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24609645›Full record

ReviewEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2014

Effect of intratympanic dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO) in an in vivo model of cisplatin-related ototoxicity.

A Roldán-Fidalgo, A Trinidad, A Rodríguez-Valiente, J R García-Berrocal, I Millán, M J Coronado, R Ramírez-Camacho

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A Roldán-FidalgoDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, C/Manuel de Falla 1, Majadahonda, 28222, Madrid, Spain, amayarf@gmail.com.
A Trinidad
A Rodríguez-Valiente
J R García-Berrocal
I Millán
M J Coronado
R Ramírez-Camacho
Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) is one of the most common solvents employed in otoprotection studies, its effect on the inner ear remains unknown. Only a few in vitro studies have addressed the effect of DMSO in cochlear cells. Up to the date, no in vivo functional studies have been reported. To determine the effect of intratympanic DMSO application in the inner ear, and to evaluate its effect in combination with cisplatin in Wistar rats, twelve Wistar rats were randomly assigned into two groups. Group A received intratympanic 1 % DMSO in both ears. Group B received intraperitoneal cisplatin (10 mg/kg) and intratympanic 0.5 % DMSO in the right ear and saline solution in the left ear. Functional changes were evaluated with Auditory Steady-State Responses before and 5 days after the procedure. Morphological changes were studied by means of confocal laser scanning microscopy following the removal of the temporal bones and cochlear dissection. Hearing threshold levels in group A did not show any statistically significant changes after the treatment. In group B, significant differences between pre- and post-treatment were found, with no statistically significant variations between right (DMSO) and left ear (saline solution). We suggest that DMSO could be safely used to dissolve hydrophobic compounds in otoprotection studies without interfering with the cochlear damage produced by cisplatin.

Indexed as

CochleaAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsCisplatinCytoprotectionDimethyl SulfoxideMaleProtective AgentsRatsRats, WistarAntineoplastic AgentsCisplatinDimethyl SulfoxideProtective Agents

Identifiers

PMID24609645
OpenAlexW2014791891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.