Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24609105›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Genetic evidence confirms polygamous mating system in a crustacean parasite with multiple hosts.

Quentin Jossart, Rémi A Wattier, Chedly Kastally, Serge Aron, Bruno David, Chantal De Ridder, Thierry Rigaud

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Quentin JossartDépartement de Biologie des Organismes, Laboratoire de Biologie Marine, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium; Biogéosciences (UMR CNRS 6282), Université de Bourgogne, Dijon, France.
Rémi A WattierBiogéosciences (UMR CNRS 6282), Université de Bourgogne, Dijon, France.
Chedly KastallyDépartement de Biologie des Organismes, Laboratoire de Biologie Marine, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium; Département de Biologie des Organismes, Behavioral and Evolutionary Ecology, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.
Serge AronDépartement de Biologie des Organismes, Behavioral and Evolutionary Ecology, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.
Bruno DavidBiogéosciences (UMR CNRS 6282), Université de Bourgogne, Dijon, France.
Chantal De RidderDépartement de Biologie des Organismes, Laboratoire de Biologie Marine, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.
Thierry RigaudBiogéosciences (UMR CNRS 6282), Université de Bourgogne, Dijon, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mating systems are diverse in animals, notably in crustaceans, but can be inferred from a limited set of parameters. Baeza and Thiel (2007) proposed a model predicting mating systems of symbiotic crustaceans with three host characteristics and the risk of predation. These authors proposed five mating systems, ranging from monogamy to polygynandry (where multiple mating occurs for both genders). Using microsatellite loci, we tested the putatively mating system of the ectoparasite crab Dissodactylus primitivus. We determined the mating frequencies of males and females, parentage assignment (COLONY & GERUD software) as well as the contents of female spermathecae. Our results are globally consistent with the model of Baeza and Thiel and showed, together with previous aquarium experiments, that this ectoparasite evolved a polygamous mating system where males and females move between hosts for mate search. Parentage analyses revealed that polyandry is frequent and concerns more than 60% of clutches, with clutches being fertilized by up to 6 different fathers. Polygyny is supported by the detection of eight males having sired two different broods. We also detected a significant paternity skew in 92% of the multipaternal broods. Moreover, this skew is probably higher than the estimation from the brood because additional alleles were detected in most of spermathecae. This high skew could be explained by several factors as sperm competition or cryptic female choice. Our genetic data, combined with previous anatomic analyses, provide consistent arguments to suggest sperm precedence in D. primitivus.

Indexed as

AnimalsCrustaceaFemaleMaleMicrosatellite RepeatsSexual Behavior, AnimalSymbiosis

Identifiers

PMID24609105
PMCPMC3946544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.