Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24609003›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Where taxonomy based on subtle morphological differences is perfectly mirrored by huge genetic distances: DNA barcoding in Protura (Hexapoda).

Monika Carol Resch, Julia Shrubovych, Daniela Bartel, Nikolaus U Szucsich, Gerald Timelthaler, Yun Bu, Manfred Walzl, Günther Pass

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Monika Carol ReschDepartment of Integrative Zoology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Julia ShrubovychInstitute of Systematics and Evolution of Animals, Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow, Poland.
Daniela BartelDepartment of Integrative Zoology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Nikolaus U SzucsichDepartment of Integrative Zoology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Gerald TimelthalerDepartment of Integrative Zoology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Yun BuInstitute of Plant Physiology & Ecology, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Manfred WalzlDepartment of Integrative Zoology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Günther PassDepartment of Integrative Zoology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
University of Vienna · ATInstitute of Systematics and Evolution of Animals · PLShanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences · CN

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 23251
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProtura is a group of tiny, primarily wingless hexapods living in soil habitats. Presently about 800 valid species are known. Diagnostic characters are very inconspicuous and difficult to recognize. Therefore taxonomic work constitutes an extraordinary challenge which requires special skills and experience. Aim of the present pilot project was to examine if DNA barcoding can be a useful additional approach for delimiting and determining proturan species. METHODOLOGY AND PRINCIPAL

findingsThe study was performed on 103 proturan specimens, collected primarily in Austria, with additional samples from China and Japan. The animals were examined with two markers, the DNA barcoding region of the mitochondrial COI gene and a fragment of the nuclear 28S rDNA (Divergent Domain 2 and 3). Due to the minuteness of Protura a modified non-destructive DNA-extraction method was used which enables subsequent species determination. Both markers separated the examined proturans into highly congruent well supported clusters. Species determination was performed without knowledge of the results of the molecular analyses. The investigated specimens comprise a total of 16 species belonging to 8 genera. Remarkably, morphological determination in all species exactly mirrors molecular clusters. The investigation revealed unusually huge genetic COI distances among the investigated proturans, both maximal intraspecific distances (0-21.3%), as well as maximal congeneric interspecifical distances (up to 44.7%).

conclusionsThe study clearly demonstrates that the tricky morphological taxonomy in Protura has a solid biological background and that accurate species delimitation is possible using both markers, COI and 28S rDNA. The fact that both molecular and morphological analyses can be performed on the same individual will be of great importance for the description of new species and offers a valuable new tool for biological and ecological studies, in which proturans have generally remained undetermined at species level.

Indexed as

AnimalsArthropodsDNA Barcoding, TaxonomicDNA, RibosomalPhylogenyDNA, Ribosomal

Identifiers

PMID24609003
PMCPMC3946556
OpenAlexW2050028217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.