Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24608822›Full record

ArticleInternational clinical psychopharmacology2014

Antidementia drug use among community-dwelling individuals with Alzheimer's disease in Finland: a nationwide register-based study.

Heidi Taipale, Antti Tanskanen, Marjaana Koponen, Anna-Maija Tolppanen, Jari Tiihonen, Sirpa Hartikainen

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International clinical psychopharmacology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Heidi TaipaleaKuopio Research Centre of Geriatric Care bSchool of Pharmacy cResearch Centre for Comparative Effectiveness and Patient Safety (RECEPS), University of Eastern Finland dDepartment of Forensic Psychiatry, Niuvanniemi Hospital, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio eNational Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland fDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Antti Tanskanen
Marjaana Koponen
Anna-Maija Tolppanen
Jari Tiihonen
Sirpa Hartikainen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate the prevalence of acetylcholinesterase inhibitor (AChEI) and memantine use, duration of treatment, concomitant use of these drugs, and factors associated with the discontinuation of AChEI therapy during 2006-2009. We utilized data from a nationwide sample of community-dwelling individuals with a clinically verified Alzheimer's disease diagnosed during the year 2005 (n=6858) as a part of the MEDALZ-2005 study. During the 4-year follow-up, 84% used AChEI and 47% used memantine. Altogether, 22% of the sample used both drugs concomitantly. The median duration of the first AChEI use period was 860 (interquartile range 295-1458) days and 1103 (interquartile range 489-1487) days for the total duration of AChEI use. Although 20% of the AChEI users discontinued the use during the first year, over half of them restarted later. The risk of discontinuation was higher for rivastigmine [hazard ratio 1.34 (confidence interval 1.22-1.48)] and galantamine users [hazard ratio 1.23 (confidence interval 1.15-1.37)] compared with donepezil users in the adjusted model. In conclusion, median time for AChEI use was over 3 years and every fifth Alzheimer's disease patient used AChEI and memantine concomitantly during the follow-up. The low rate of discontinuation is consistent with the Finnish Care Guideline but in contrast to the results reported from many other countries.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAlzheimer DiseaseCholinesterase InhibitorsCohort StudiesDiagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental DisordersDonepezilDrug MonitoringDrug PrescriptionsDrug Therapy, CombinationExcitatory Amino Acid AntagonistsFemaleFinlandFollow-Up StudiesGalantamineGuideline AdherenceCholinesterase InhibitorsDonepezilExcitatory Amino Acid AntagonistsGalantamineIndansMemantineNootropic AgentsPhenylcarbamatesPiperidinesRivastigmine

Identifiers

PMID24608822
PMCPMC4047310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.