Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24608070›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in immunology2014

Novel vaccine approaches for protection against intracellular pathogens.

Kristin L Griffiths, Shabaana A Khader

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in immunology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. In Silico Tools for Predicting Novel Epitopes.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kristin L GriffithsDepartment of Molecular Microbiology, Campus Box 8230, 660 South Euclid Avenue, St. Louis, MO 63110-1093, USA.
Shabaana A KhaderDepartment of Molecular Microbiology, Campus Box 8230, 660 South Euclid Avenue, St. Louis, MO 63110-1093, USA. Electronic address: khader@wustl.edu.

Funding

ROLE OF IL-17 IN PROTECTIVE VACCINE-INDUCED IMMUNE RESPONSES AGAINST TUBERCULOSISR01HL105427 · NHLBI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI KHADER, SHABAANA A. · 2011 to 2025
$5.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS HL105427NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL105427
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccination against intracellular pathogens requires generation of a pool of memory T cells able to respond upon infection and mediate either killing of the infected cell or induce killing mechanisms in the infected cell. T cell-inducing vaccines must aim to target the antigen to antigen-presenting cells (APCs) so that it can be presented on MHC molecules on the cell surface. Methods to do this include making use of vectors such as plasmid DNA or viruses, live attenuated pathogens or subunit vaccines targeted and enhanced using adjuvants. The choice of approach should be guided by the phenotype and localization of the desired T cell response. This review will discuss current approaches in the pipeline for the development of T cell-inducing vaccines, including vectored, live attenuated, and subunit vaccines.

Indexed as

AnimalsGenetic VectorsHumansIntracellular SpaceT-LymphocytesVaccinesVaccines

Identifiers

PMID24608070
PMCPMC4037333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.