Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24607989›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in microbiology2014

Bacterial mechanosensitive channels: progress towards an understanding of their roles in cell physiology.

Ian R Booth

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in microbiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 130 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Different sodium and potassium homeostasis patterns between rare and abundant microbial taxa in biological soil crusts revealed by metatranscriptomics.Biometals : an international journal on the role of metal ions in biology, biochemistry, and medicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Lipid Regulation of Mechanosensitive Ion Channels.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Ian R BoothSchool of Medical Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, United Kingdom; Visiting Associate in Chemistry, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, United States. Electronic address: i.r.booth@abdn.ac.uk.
California Institute of Technology · US

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H017917/1Wellcome Trust WT092552MA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial mechanosensitive channels sense the changes in lateral tension in the bilayer of the cytoplasmic membrane generated by rapid water flow into the cell. Two major structural families are found widely distributed across bacteria and archaea: MscL and MscS. Our understanding of the mechanisms of gating has advanced rapidly through genetic analysis, structural biology and electrophysiology. It is only recently that the analysis of the physiological roles of the channels has kept pace with mechanistic studies. Recent advances have increased our understanding of the role of the channels in preventing structural perturbation during osmotic transitions and its relationship to water flow across the membrane. It is to these recent developments that this review is dedicated.

Indexed as

Bacterial Physiological PhenomenaMechanical PhenomenaMechanotransduction, CellularArchaeaCell MembraneCell Physiological PhenomenaComprehensionModels, Biological

Identifiers

PMID24607989
PMCPMC4005912
OpenAlexW2149229791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.