Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24607675›Full record

Trial reportSocial science & medicine (1982)2014

Examining mediators of housing mobility on adolescent asthma: results from a housing voucher experiment.

Nicole M Schmidt, Alisa K Lincoln, Quynh C Nguyen, Dolores Acevedo-Garcia, Theresa L Osypuk

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Social science & medicine (1982), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Asthma: Biomedical and Psychobiological Perspectives.Biopsychosocial science and medicine · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nicole M SchmidtNortheastern University, Institute on Urban Health Research and Practice, Bouvé College of Health Sciences, 360 Huntington Ave, 310 International Village, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Alisa K LincolnNortheastern University, Institute on Urban Health Research and Practice, Bouvé College of Health Sciences, 360 Huntington Ave, 310 International Village, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Northeastern University, Department of Sociology and Anthropology, and Department of Health Sciences, 360 Huntington Ave, 521 Holmes, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Quynh C NguyenNortheastern University, Institute on Urban Health Research and Practice, Bouvé College of Health Sciences, 360 Huntington Ave, 310 International Village, Boston, MA 02115, USA; University of Utah, Department of Health Promotion and Education, 1901 E. South Campus, Annex Room 2124, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
Dolores Acevedo-GarciaBrandeis University, Heller School for Social Policy and Management, 415 South Street, Heller-Brown Building, 364, Waltham, MA 02453, USA.
Theresa L OsypukUniversity of Minnesota School of Public Health, Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, West Bank Office Building, Suite 300, 1300 S. Second Street, Minneapolis, MN 55454, USA. Electronic address: tosypuk@umn.edu.

Funding

Effects of a housing policy experiment on youth behavioral problemsR01MD006064 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI OSYPUK, THERESA LOUISE · 2010 to 2012
$1.1M
Effects of a neighborhood experiment on adolescent female psychological distressR21HD066312 · NICHD · NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY · PI OSYPUK, THERESA LOUISE · 2010 to 2011
$434k
NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD066312NICHD NIH HHS R21HD066312NIMHD NIH HHS R01 MD006064NIMHD NIH HHS R01MD006064
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Literature on neighborhood effects on health largely employs non-experimental study designs and does not typically test specific neighborhood mediators that influence health. We address these gaps using the Moving to Opportunity (MTO) housing voucher experiment. Research has documented both beneficial and adverse effects on health in MTO, but mediating mechanisms have not been tested explicitly. We tested mediation of MTO effects on youth asthma (n = 2829). MTO randomized families living in public housing to an experimental group receiving a voucher to subsidize rental housing, or a control group receiving no voucher, and measured outcomes 4-7 years following randomization. MTO had a harmful main effect vs. controls for self-reported asthma diagnosis (b = 0.24, p = 0.06), past-year asthma attack (b = 0.44, p = 0.02), and past-year wheezing (b = 0.17, p = 0.17). Using Inverse Odds Weighting mediation we tested mental health, smoking, and four housing dimensions as potential mediators of the MTO-asthma relationship. We found no significant mediation overall, but mediation may be gender-specific. Gender-stratified models displayed countervailing mediation effects among girls for asthma diagnosis by smoking (p = 0.05) and adult-reported housing quality (p = 0.06), which reduced total effects by 35% and 42% respectively. MTO treatment worsened boys' mental health and mental health reduced treatment effects on asthma diagnosis by 27%. Future research should explore other potential mediators and gender-specific mediators of MTO effects on asthma. Improving measurement of housing conditions and other potential mediators may help elucidate the "black box" of neighborhood effects.

Indexed as

Public HousingAdolescentAsthmaCitiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleResidence CharacteristicsSex DistributionSmokingUnited StatesAsthmaHousingHousing mobilityMediationNeighborhood

Identifiers

PMID24607675
PMCPMC4070421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.