ArticleProgress in cardiovascular diseases
Cardiac rehabilitation series: Canada.
Article in Progress in cardiovascular diseases. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07322510 (Health Behaviour Change, Education on Risk Factor Reduction, Physical Activity Guidance, and Nutrition Counselling With a Remote Team to Support Patient Progress Using Technology in Synchronization With Medication Management and CardioWatch 287-2.), which is not on this map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Health Behaviour Change, Education on Risk Factor Reduction, Physical Activity Guidance, and Nutrition Counselling With a Remote Team to Support Patient Progress Using Technology in Synchronization With Medication Management and CardioWatch 287-2. (HEARTS in Sync + CardioWatch 287-2)
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 87 citations in OpenAlex.
- Fit, Female or Fifty-Is Cardiac Rehabilitation "Fit" for Purpose for All? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis With Meta-Regression.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Internet-based training of coronary artery patients: the Heart Cycle Trial.Heart and vessels · 2017Trial
- Home-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation in Cardiovascular Diseases: A Narrative Review of Progress, Challenges, and Future Directions.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Review
- Utility of Cardiac Rehabilitation Following Surgical Treatment of Infective Endocarditis.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Cardiac Rehabilitation in the Modern Era: Evidence, Equity, and Evolving Delivery Models Across the Cardiovascular Spectrum.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Impact of cardiac rehabilitation exercise frequency on exercise capacity in patients with coronary artery disease: a retrospective study.The Libyan journal of medicine · 2024Article
- Cardiorespiratory Fitness Benefits of Long-Term Maintenance-Phase Cardiac Rehabilitation in Males and Females: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Physiotherapy Canada. Physiotherapie Canada · 2024Article
- Advances, Challenges, and Progress in Cardiac Rehabilitation in Chronic CVD Management.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2023Review
- Article
- The relationship between anxiety sensitivity and clinical outcomes in cardiac rehabilitation: A scoping review.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2022Article
- Evaluation of Current Resources Available for Community-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation in Korea: A Nationwide Survey Study.Journal of Korean medical science · 2022Article
- Cardiac rehabilitation program: An exploration of patient experiences and perspectives on program dropout.Worldviews on evidence-based nursing · 2022Article
- Cardiac Rehabilitation in Canada During COVID-19.CJC open · 2021Article
- Brief Vigorous Stair Climbing Effectively Improves Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Randomized Trial.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2021Article
- Cardiac Rehabilitation: A Bibliometric Review From 2001 to 2020.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Review
- Quality indicators for cardiac rehabilitation after myocardial infarction in China: a consensus panel and practice test.BMJ open · 2020Article
- Cardiac Rehabilitation During Quarantine in COVID-19 Pandemic: Challenges for Center-Based Programs.Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2020Article
- Inclusion of People Poststroke in Cardiac Rehabilitation Programs in Canada: A Missed Opportunity for Referral.CJC open · 2020Article
- Australian cardiac rehabilitation exercise parameter characteristics and perceptions of high-intensity interval training: a cross-sectional survey.Open access journal of sports medicine · 2018Article
- Evaluation of a Web-Based Tailored Nursing Intervention (TAVIE en m@rche) Aimed at Increasing Walking After an Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Protocol.JMIR research protocols · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Cardiovascular disease is among the leading causes of mortality and morbidity in Canada. Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) has a long robust history here, and there are established clinical practice guidelines. While the effectiveness of CR in the Canadian context is clear, only 34% of eligible patients participate, and strategies to increase access for under-represented groups (e.g., women, ethnic minority groups) are not yet universally applied. Identified CR barriers include lack of referral and physician recommendation, travel and distance, and low perceived need. Indeed there is now a national policy position recommending systematic inpatient referral to CR in Canada. Recent development of 30 CR quality indicators and the burgeoning national CR registry will enable further measurement and improvement of the quality of CR care in Canada. Finally, the Canadian Association of CR is one of the founding members of the International Council of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation, to promote CR globally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.