ArticleBiophysical journal2014
A mathematical model of force generation by flexible kinetochore-microtubule attachments.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Strain stiffening of Ndc80 complexes attached to microtubule plus ends.Biophysical journal · 2022Article
- Electrostatic forces drive poleward chromosome motions at kinetochores.Cell division · 2016Article
- Multisite phosphorylation of the NDC80 complex gradually tunes its microtubule-binding affinity.Molecular biology of the cell · 2015Article
- Accurate phosphoregulation of kinetochore-microtubule affinity requires unconstrained molecular interactions.The Journal of cell biology · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Important mechanical events during mitosis are facilitated by the generation of force by chromosomal kinetochore sites that attach to dynamic microtubule tips. Several theoretical models have been proposed for how these sites generate force, and molecular diffusion of kinetochore components has been proposed as a key component that facilitates kinetochore function. However, these models do not explicitly take into account the recently observed flexibility of kinetochore components and variations in microtubule shape under load. In this paper, we develop a mathematical model for kinetochore-microtubule connections that directly incorporates these two important components, namely, flexible kinetochore binder elements, and the effects of tension load on the shape of shortening microtubule tips. We compare our results with existing biased diffusion models and explore the role of protein flexibility inforce generation at the kinetochore-microtubule junctions. Our model results suggest that kinetochore component flexibility and microtubule shape variation under load significantly diminish the need for high diffusivity (or weak specific binding) of kinetochore components; optimal kinetochore binder stiffness regimes are predicted by our model. Based on our model results, we suggest that the underlying principles of biased diffusion paradigm need to be reinterpreted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.