Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24606084›Full record

SynthesisThe Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism2014

Acromegaly clinical trial methodology impact on reported biochemical efficacy rates of somatostatin receptor ligand treatments: a meta-analysis.

John D Carmichael, Vivien S Bonert, Miriam Nuño, Diana Ly, Shlomo Melmed

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 79 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
11.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 171 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Can acromegaly be controlled in all cases?Journal of neuroendocrinology · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

John D CarmichaelPituitary Center (J.D.C., V.S.B., S.M.), Department of Medicine, and Department of Neurosurgery (M.N., D.L.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California 90048.
Vivien S Bonert
Miriam Nuño
Diana Ly
Shlomo Melmed
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center · US

Funding

Mechanisms of Pituitary TumorigenesisR01CA075979 · NCI · CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER · PI MELMED, SHLOMO · 1999 to 2012
$3.5M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA075979
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBiochemical efficacy of somatostatin receptor ligand (SRL) treatment in acromegaly is defined by metrics for GH and IGF-1 control. Since the earliest therapeutic trials, biochemical control criteria, medical formulations, and assay techniques have evolved. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe searched PubMed for English-language trials published from 1974 to 2012 evaluating 10 or more patients, with a duration of more than 3 months and biochemical control as a key objective. We used a random-effects model to compare biochemical outcomes for octreotide and lanreotide trials according to study design characteristics.

resultsA total of 4464 patients were enrolled in the analyzed trials; 4125 were treated, and 3787 completed study treatment. Overall achieved control rates were 56% for mean GH and 55% for IGF-1 normalization. Treatment duration was significantly related to both GH (P < .001) and IGF-1 control (P = .02). Prior SRL therapy (P = .01), and year of study publication (P = .03) were related to biochemical control for GH but not IGF-1. No statistically significant differences in GH or IGF-1 response rates were observed for multicenter vs single center, retrospective vs prospective, study drug, and preselection for SRL responsiveness. Dosing scheme, GH response criterion, or switch study design were also not statistically significant in determining GH or IGF-1 response rate.

conclusionsClinical design characteristics anticipated to impart efficacy bias including switching, preselection for SRL responsiveness, and retrospective design had no statistically significant impact on efficacy determination. Later year of publication, study duration, and prior SRL use are significant efficacy determinants for acromegaly trial outcomes.

Indexed as

AcromegalyClinical Trials as TopicHumansOctreotidePeptides, CyclicSomatostatinTreatment OutcomelanreotideOctreotidePeptides, CyclicSomatostatin

Identifiers

PMID24606084
PMCPMC4010703
OpenAlexW2038754029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.