Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24605808›Full record

ReviewJournal of internal medicine2014

Clinical trials and late-stage drug development for Alzheimer's disease: an appraisal from 1984 to 2014.

L S Schneider, F Mangialasche, N Andreasen, H Feldman, E Giacobini, R Jones, V Mantua, P Mecocci, L Pani, B Winblad and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of internal medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 297 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
297citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
39.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

297 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 627 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Matrix metalloproteinase 14 modulates diabetes and Alzheimer's disease cross-talk: a meta-analysis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2018
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Sample enrichment for clinical trials to show delay of onset in huntington disease.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2019
    Trial
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Digital seed amplification assay for TDP-43 aggregate quantification in CSF.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Theranostic Nanoparticles for Fluorosensitive Visualization and Inhibition of Amyloid Beta-Induced Neuroinflammation.Particle & particle systems characterization : measurement and description of particle properties and behavior in powders and other disperse systems · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

237 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 9 institutions in 7 countries.

L S SchneiderDepartments of Psychiatry and the Behavioral Sciences, and Neurology, Keck School of Medicine, Leonard Davis School of Gerontology of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
F Mangialasche
N Andreasen
H Feldman
E Giacobini
R Jones
V Mantua
P Mecocci
L Pani
B Winblad
M Kivipelto
Italian Medicines Agency · ITKarolinska Institutet · SEStockholm University · SEThe Research Institute for the Care of Older People · GBUniversity Hospital of Geneva · CHUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Eastern Finland · FIUniversity of Perugia · ITUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

VASCULAR RISK AND COGNITIVE STATUS IN A LATINO POPULATIONP50AG005142 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI BRASKIE, MEREDITH NICOLE · 1985 to 2019
$41.0M
Estrogen Receptor-beta phytoSERMs for Management of Menopause and Memory DeclineR01AG033288 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI SCHNEIDER, LON S · 2010 to 2012
$1.6M
Synthesis of Longer-Term Alzheimer Disease Studies in Order to Model and ImproveR01AG037561 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI SCHNEIDER, LON S · 2011 to 2013
$1.6M
NIA NIH HHS P50 AG005142NIA NIH HHS P50 AG05142NIA NIH HHS R01 AG033288NIA NIH HHS R01 AG037561
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The modern era of drug development for Alzheimer's disease began with the proposal of the cholinergic hypothesis of memory impairment and the 1984 research criteria for Alzheimer's disease. Since then, despite the evaluation of numerous potential treatments in clinical trials, only four cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine have shown sufficient safety and efficacy to allow marketing approval at an international level. Although this is probably because the other drugs tested were ineffective, inadequate clinical development methods have also been blamed for the failures. Here, we review the development of treatments for Alzheimer's disease during the past 30 years, considering the drugs, potential targets, late-stage clinical trials, development methods, emerging use of biomarkers and evolution of regulatory considerations in order to summarize advances and anticipate future developments. We have considered late-stage Alzheimer's disease drug development from 1984 to 2013, including individual clinical trials, systematic and qualitative reviews, meta-analyses, methods, commentaries, position papers and guidelines. We then review the evolution of drugs in late clinical development, methods, biomarkers and regulatory issues. Although a range of small molecules and biological products against many targets have been investigated in clinical trials, the predominant drug targets have been the cholinergic system and the amyloid cascade. Trial methods have evolved incrementally: inclusion criteria have largely remained focused on mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease criteria, recently extending to early or prodromal Alzheimer disease or 'mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's disease', for drugs considered to be disease modifying. The duration of trials has remained at 6-12 months for drugs intended to improve symptoms; 18- to 24-month trials have been established for drugs expected to attenuate clinical course. Cognitive performance, activities of daily living, global change and severity ratings have persisted as the primary clinically relevant outcomes. Regulatory guidance and oversight have evolved to allow for enrichment of early-stage Alzheimer's disease trial samples using biomarkers and phase-specific outcomes. In conclusion, validated drug targets for Alzheimer's disease remain to be developed. Only drugs that affect an aspect of cholinergic function have shown consistent, but modest, clinical effects in late-phase trials. There is opportunity for substantial improvements in drug discovery and clinical development methods.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseBiomarkersCholinesterase InhibitorsDopamine AgentsDrug MonitoringHumansMedication Therapy ManagementMemantineMemory DisordersNootropic AgentsPractice Guidelines as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicBiomarkersCholinesterase InhibitorsDopamine AgentsMemantineNootropic AgentsAlzheimerclinical trialdementiadrug developmenttreatment

Identifiers

PMID24605808
PMCPMC3956752
OpenAlexW1994397669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.