ArticleJournal of clinical imaging science2013
Venous intravasation as a complication and potential pitfall during hysterosalpingography: re-emerging study with a novel classification.
Article in Journal of clinical imaging science, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Tubal flushing for subfertility.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Treatment effect of oil-based contrast is related to experienced pain at HSG: a post-hoc analysis of the randomised H2Oil study.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2019Trial
- A rare complication of hysterosalpingography: A case report of venous intravasation.Radiology case reports · 2026Article
- Intravasation is not only a complication but also a radiological finding for tubal pathologies in hysterosalpingography.The British journal of radiology · 2025Article
- Small-vessel vasculitis: a potential rare adverse event following hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (HyFoSy).Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- Value of painless transvaginal four-dimensional hysterosalpingo contrast sonography in reducing venous intravasation: a comparative study.Journal of ultrasound · 2024Article
- Severe Pain and Postoperative Effects during Hysterosalpingography: A Meta-Analysis.Iranian journal of public health · 2024Review
- Development of a Nomogram for Predicting Intravasation Before Transvaginal 4-Dimensional Hysterosalpingo-Contrast Sonography.International journal of women's health · 2022Article
- Venous Intravasation During Hysterosalpingography.Cureus · 2021Article
- Green urine sign after laparoscopic chromopertubation as an effect of severe contrast intravasation: a report of three cases.The Journal of international medical research · 2020Article
- Complications after hysterosalpingography with oil- or water-based contrast: results of a nationwide survey.Human reproduction open · 2020Article
- Letter: Higher reported rates of intravasation of oil-soluble contrast media-there may be a silver lining.Human reproduction open · 2020Article
- Venous intravasation during hysterosalpingography.The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences · 2019Article
- Contrast Intravasation During Hysterosalpingography.Polish journal of radiology · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesPresently, hysterosalpingography (HSG) is used as a means to evaluate women with infertility and repetitive pregnancy loss. Venous intravasation is a complication and potential pitfall during HSG and analogous procedures including hysteroscopy. The aim of our study was to assess the venous intravasation and to obtain critical information for more secure and more accurate procedures. In particular, the primary goal of the present study was to compare HSG without and with intravasation to identify differences seen on HSG and to assess the predisposing factors of intravasation. The secondary goal was to describe clinical- and imaging-based novel classification of intravasation. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis study included a patient cohort of 569 patients who underwent HSG between 2008 and 2011 at our center in the absence (control group) or presence (study group) of intravasation. Intravasation classified from level 0 (no intravasation) to level 3 (severe intravasation) was compared with preprocedural (demographic and clinical) and procedural (HSG) data. Data were analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) statistical software.
resultsOf the 569 patients undergoing HSG, 528 showed no intravasation and 41 (7.2%) patients showed intravasation when associated with preprocedural (leukocytes, menometrorrhagia, secondary infertility, ectopic pregnancy, abortus, polycystic ovaries, endometriosis, and interventions) and procedural (pain, scheduling, endometrial-uterine nature, and spillage) parameters. Moreover, intravasation was lower in women with smooth endometrium, triangular uterus, and homogeneous peritoneal spillage. No association was found between age, tubal patency, increased pressure, and intravasation.
conclusionsUsing a novel classification method, intravasation can be observed in women during HSG and associates with preprocedural and procedural predisposing factors in subsumed conditions. This classification method will be useful for improving the efficiency and accuracy of HSG and related procedures by minimization of severe complications caused by intravasation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.