ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2014
Endoscopic innovations to increase the adenoma detection rate during colonoscopy.
Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 88 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Effect of Right Colon Retroflexion on Adenoma Detection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Journal of clinical gastroenterology · 2017Pooled it
- Magnitude of Missed Esophageal Adenocarcinoma After Barrett's Esophagus Diagnosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Gastroenterology · 2016Pooled it
- Effect of etomidate added to propofol target-controlled infusion in bidirectional endoscopy: A randomized clinical trial.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025Trial
- Oral IBGard™ Before Colonoscopy: A Single-Center Double-Blinded, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2021Trial
- The propofol-sparing effect of intravenous lidocaine in elderly patients undergoing colonoscopy: a randomized, double-blinded, controlled study.BMC anesthesiology · 2020Trial
- Trial
- See more, detect more: investigating colonic inspection techniques and polyp detection using machine learning.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Quality Indicators of Endoscopists for Both Index and Surveillance Colonoscopy are Associated With Risk of Metachronous Colorectal Neoplasia.Clinical and translational gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Patient- and endoscopist-related risk factors and etiological categorization of post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer.Endoscopy international open · 2025Article
- Trial protocol for COLO-DETECT: A randomized controlled trial of lesion detection comparing colonoscopy assisted by the GI Genius™ artificial intelligence endoscopy module with standard colonoscopy.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2022Article
- Does self-reported symptom questionnaire play a role in nonadherence to colonoscopy for risk-increased population in the Tianjin colorectal cancer screening programme?BMC gastroenterology · 2021Article
- Number of significant polyps detected per six-minute withdrawal time at colonoscopy (SP6): a new measure of colonoscopy efficiency and quality.Frontline gastroenterology · 2020Article
- Correlation between ultrasound consolidated score and simple endoscopic score for determining the activity of Crohn's disease.The British journal of radiology · 2020Article
- Comparison of colon adenoma detection rates using cap-assisted and Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial.Endoscopy international open · 2019Article
- Peppermint Oil to Improve Visualization in Screening Colonoscopy: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.Gastroenterology research · 2019Article
- Tumor recognition of peanut agglutinin-immobilized fluorescent nanospheres in biopsied human tissues.European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics : official journal of Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Pharmazeutische Verfahrenstechnik e.V · 2019Article
- Endocuff assisted colonoscopy significantly increases sessile serrated adenoma detection in veterans.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2017Article
- Risk factors of missed colorectal lesions after colonoscopy.Medicine · 2017Observational
- Colonoscopy: Advanced and Emerging Techniques-A Review of Colonoscopic Approaches to Colorectal Conditions.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2017Review
- Strategies to Increase Adenoma Detection Rates.Current treatment options in gastroenterology · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Up to a quarter of polyps and adenomas are missed during colonoscopy due to poor visualization behind folds and the inner curves of flexures, and the presence of flat lesions that are difficult to detect. These numbers may however be conservative because they mainly come from back-to-back studies performed with standard colonoscopes, which are unable to visualize the entire mucosal surface. In the past several years, new endoscopic techniques have been introduced to improve the detection of polyps and adenomas. The introduction of high definition colonoscopes and visual image enhancement technologies have been suggested to lead to better recognition of flat and small lesions, but the absolute increase in diagnostic yield seems limited. Cap assisted colonoscopy and water-exchange colonoscopy are methods to facilitate cecal intubation and increase patients comfort, but show only a marginal or no benefit on polyp and adenoma detection. Retroflexion is routinely used in the rectum for the inspection of the dentate line, but withdrawal in retroflexion in the colon is in general not recommended due to the risk of perforation. In contrast, colonoscopy with the Third-Eye Retroscope® may result in considerable lower miss rates compared to standard colonoscopy, but this technique is not practical in case of polypectomy and is more time consuming. The recently introduced Full Spectrum Endoscopy™ colonoscopes maintains the technical capabilities of standard colonoscopes and provides a much wider view of 330 degrees compared to the 170 degrees with standard colonoscopes. Remarkable lower adenoma miss rates with this new technique were recently demonstrated in the first randomized study. Nonetheless, more studies are required to determine the exact additional diagnostic yield in clinical practice. Optimizing the efficacy of colorectal cancer screening and surveillance requires high definition colonoscopes with improved virtual chromoendoscopy technology that visualize the whole colon mucosa while maintaining optimal washing, suction and therapeutic capabilities, and keeping the procedural time as low and patient discomfort as optimal as possible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.