Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24604952›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of medical and paediatric oncology : official journal of Indian Society of Medical & Paediatric Oncology2013

Factors affecting wound complications in head and neck surgery: A prospective study.

Devendra A Chaukar, Anuja D Deshmukh, Tanveer Majeed, Pankaj Chaturvedi, Prathamesh Pai, Anil K D'cruz

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of medical and paediatric oncology : official journal of Indian Society of Medical & Paediatric Oncology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Harmonic scalpel impact on blood loss and operating time in major head and neck surgery: a randomized clinical trial.Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale · 2016
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Pattern of Post-Operative Infections Among Oral Cavity Cancer Patients in a Tertiary Care Cancer Centre: A Prospective Study.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2022
    Article
  9. Surgical wound classification in otolaryngology: A state-of-the-art review.World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2022
    Review
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Characteristics and intraoperative treatments associated with head and neck free tissue transfer complications and failures.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2015
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Devendra A ChaukarDepartment of Head & Neck Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Anuja D DeshmukhDepartment of Head & Neck Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Tanveer MajeedJoy Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Pankaj ChaturvediDepartment of Head & Neck Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Prathamesh PaiDepartment of Head & Neck Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Anil K D'cruzDepartment of Head & Neck Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Tata Memorial Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextHead and neck surgeries are complex. Wound complications are associated with considerable morbidity and can result in delay in the adjuvant treatment. Identification of factors will help in formulating preventive guidelines.

aimsThe aim of this study is to identify perioperative factors responsible for wound complications. SETTINGS AND

designProspective study of 186 head and neck patients. SUBJECTS AND

methodsPre-operative, intraoperative and post-operative factors were recorded. Each patient was evaluated for minor and major wound complications twice daily during the hospital stay. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Chi-square test was used for univariate and log regression test was used for multivariate analysis.

resultsThe overall wound complication rate was 29% with 7% major and 22% minor complications. On univariate analysis, laryngeal and hypopharyngeal location, advanced T stage, poor oral hygiene, clean-contaminated surgery, low Karnofsky performance status (KPS), flap reconstruction, blood loss more than 1000 ml, perioperative blood transfusion, duration of surgery greater than 4.3 h and post-operative hemoglobin lesser than 11 g%, post-operative tracheostomy and resection of mandible were statistical significant factors. On multivariate analysis, post-operative tracheostomy, low KPS, post-operative serum albumin less than 3.7 g/dl and duration of surgery greater than 4.3 h were significant factors.

conclusionApart from unavoidable factors, it is essential to take care of certain factors viz nutrition, haemoglobin, oral hygiene, asepsis and repeating antibiotics in prolonged surgery.

Indexed as

Head and neck cancersrisk factorswound complicationswound infection

Identifiers

PMID24604952
PMCPMC3932590
OpenAlexW1986138378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.