Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24604389›Full record

ArticlePediatric surgery international2014

Does Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage require eradication prior to elective ambulatory surgery in children?

Zvi Steiner, Orna Ben Natan, Igor Sukhotnik, Arnold G Coran, Gershon Keren

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric surgery international, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Zvi SteinerDepartment of Pediatric Surgery B, Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, Hadera, Israel, tzvikast@012.net.il.
Orna Ben Natan
Igor Sukhotnik
Arnold G Coran
Gershon Keren
Hillel Yaffe Medical Center · ILBnai Zion Medical Center · ILC. S. Mott Children's Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRates of community-associated Staphylococcus aureus, and particularly of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in children, have increased in recent years. We investigated rates of nasal colonization of S. aureus, and a possible correlation between nasal carriage and wound infection.

methodsA prospective study of children scheduled for elective day-care surgical procedures between January 2008 and December 2012 at one medical center. Nasal swabs were taken before surgery, and follow-up was performed 1-2 weeks following surgery.

resultsOf 1,127 children (median age 2 years, 70.6% males), positive nasal swabs were detected in 228 (20.2%). Rates of S. aureus nasal carriage were lowest for ages 6 months to 2 years and highest for ages 4-11 years. Child's sex did not associate with the risk for positive nasal swabs. Positive nasal swabs for MRSA were detected in five boys (0.62% of the population). Five children (0.44%) had wound infection. None of them was a nasal carrier.

conclusionsNo correlation was observed between positive nasal swabs and wound infection in children who were candidates for elective ambulatory operations. This suggests that evaluation of S. aureus nasal carriage and eradication may not be necessary in this population.

Indexed as

AdolescentAge FactorsAmbulatory Surgical ProceduresCarrier StateChildChild, PreschoolElective Surgical ProceduresFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusNoseProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID24604389
OpenAlexW2040251508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.