Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24604328›Full record

ArticleTumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine2014

Association of DNA repair and cell cycle gene variations with breast cancer risk in Northeast Indian population: a multiple interaction analysis.

Mishi Kaushal Wasson, Pradeep Singh Chauhan, L C Singh, Dheeraj Katara, Jagannath Dev Sharma, Eric Zomawia, Amal Kataki, Sujala Kapur, Sunita Saxena

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Association betweenBioscience reports · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. MiRNA-binding site functional polymorphisms in DNA repair genes RAD51, RAD52, and XRCC2 and breast cancer risk in Chinese population.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2016
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Mishi Kaushal WassonNational Institute of Pathology, ICMR, Safdarjung Hospital Campus, New Delhi, 110029, India.
Pradeep Singh Chauhan
L C Singh
Dheeraj Katara
Jagannath Dev Sharma
Eric Zomawia
Amal Kataki
Sujala Kapur
Sunita Saxena
Safdarjang Hospital · INBhubaneswar Borooah Cancer Institute · INNational Institute of Pathology · INNational JALMA Institute for Leprosy & Other Mycobacterial Diseases · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polymorphisms in DNA repair and cell cycle genes contribute to increased breast cancer (BC) risk. Their association and interaction in relation to betel quid and tobacco chewing habits need exhaustive multi-analytical investigation to explain BC predisposition due to DNA damage. Polymorphism in TP53-72Arg>Pro, RAD51-135G>C, BRCA2, and CCND1-G870A were examined in 204 BC cases and 217 controls from Northeast Indian population. Multifaceted analytic approaches were used to explore relationships between polymorphisms, tobacco history, and BC susceptibility. Betel quid chewing was identified as the predominant risk factor. CCND-AA and dominant model showed protection towards BC in betel quid chewer (BQC) [(0.28 (0.10-0.77), 0.01 and 0.32 (0.12-0.81), 0.01)] and non-betel quid chewers (NBQC) [(0.26 (0.09-0.78), 0.01 and 0.37 (0.16-0.87), 0.02)]. TP53-Pro/Pro genotype showed protection towards BC in NBQC (0.29 (0.10-0.81), p=0.01) and (0.51 (0.32-0.80), p=0.003, respectively). RAD51-C allele was associated with BC risk (2.03 (1.26-3.30) 0.002) in BQC. Two BQC cases had BRCA2 8415G>T:K2729N mutation in Exon18. MDR analysis showed best four locus model with TBA 0.6765 (0.005) and CVC of 10/10 in NBQC. Interaction diagram concurred the interactions between TP53 and RAD51 (1.32 %) with independent effect (1.89 %) of CCND1in NBQC. In CART analysis, BQC with CCND1 GG genotype were at risk (OR=33.0; 95 % CI=6.08-179.07), p<0.001) followed by combination of BQC, CCND1, No-Smk, and Alc (OR=42.00; 95 % CI=5.11-345.11, p<0.001). Risk was also observed in BQC, CCND1, No-Smk, Non-Alc, and TP53 combination (OR=14.84; 95 % CI=3.13-70.34, p<0.001) and BQC, CCND1, No-Smk, Non-Alc, TP53 (OR=9.40; 95 % CI=1.99-44.34, p<0.001). NBQC group showed risk with combination of NBQC and TP53 (OR=5.54; 95 % CI=1.11-27.42, p=0.03). Genetic variants in DNA repair and cell cycle genes contribute to BC risk through gene-gene and gene-environmental interactions.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseAdultAgedArecaBreast NeoplasmsCell CycleCyclin D1DNA RepairEntropyFemaleGenes, BRCA2Genes, p53Genetic VariationHumansMiddle AgedPolymorphism, Single NucleotideCCND1 protein, humanCyclin D1Rad51 Recombinase

Identifiers

PMID24604328
OpenAlexW2033483606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.