Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24603981›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastroenterology2015

A novel serum marker, glycosylated Wisteria floribunda agglutinin-positive Mac-2 binding protein (WFA(+)-M2BP), for assessing liver fibrosis.

Takeo Toshima, Ken Shirabe, Toru Ikegami, Tomoharu Yoshizumi, Atsushi Kuno, Akira Togayachi, Masanori Gotoh, Hisashi Narimatsu, Masaaki Korenaga, Masashi Mizokami and 3 more

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastroenterology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 85 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
85citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
12.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

85 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 179 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Advances in laboratory medicine · 2024
    Article
  17. Serum biomarkers for liver fibrosis assessment.Advances in laboratory medicine · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

25 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Takeo ToshimaDepartment of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan.
Ken Shirabe
Toru Ikegami
Tomoharu Yoshizumi
Atsushi Kuno
Akira Togayachi
Masanori Gotoh
Hisashi Narimatsu
Masaaki Korenaga
Masashi Mizokami
Akihito Nishie
Shinichi Aishima
Yoshihiko Maehara
Kyushu University · JPNational Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology · JPCenter for Global Health · USNational Center for Global Health and Medicine · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecently, a novel marker, hyperglycosylated Wisteria floribunda agglutinin-positive Mac-2 binding protein (WFA(+)-M2BP), was developed for liver fibrosis using the glycan "sugar chain"-based immunoassay; however, the feasibility of WFA(+)-M2BP for assessing liver fibrosis has not been proven with clinical samples of hepatitis.

methodsSerum WFA(+)-M2BP values were evaluated in 200 patients with chronic liver disease who underwent histological examination of liver fibrosis. The diagnostic accuracy of WFA(+)-M2BP values was compared with various fibrosis markers, such as ultrasound based-virtual touch tissue quantification (VTTQ), magnetic resonance imaging based-liver-to-major psoas muscle intensity ratio (LMR), and serum markers, including hyaluronic acid, type 4 collagen, and aspartate transaminase to platelet ratio index (APRI).

resultsSerum WFA(+)-M2BP levels in patients with fibrosis grades F0, F1, F2, F3, and F4 had cutoff indices 1.62, 1.82, 3.02, 3.32, and 3.67, respectively, and there were significant differences between fibrosis stages F1 and F2, and between F2 and F3 (P < 0.01). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves for the diagnosis of fibrosis (F ≥ 3) using serum WFA(+)-M2BP values (0.812) was almost comparable to that using VTTQ examination (0.814), but was superior to the other surrogate markers, including LMR index (0.766), APRI (0.694), hyaluronic acid (0.683), and type 4 collagen (0.625) (P < 0.01 each).

conclusionsSerum WFA(+)-M2BP values based on a glycan-based immunoassay is an accurate, reliable, and reproducible method for the assessment of liver fibrosis. This approach could be clinically feasible for evaluation of beneficial therapy through the quantification of liver fibrosis in hepatitis patients if this measurement application is commercially realized.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntigens, NeoplasmBiomarkersFeasibility StudiesFemaleGlycosylationHepatitis B, ChronicHepatitis C, ChronicHumansLiver CirrhosisMaleMembrane GlycoproteinsMiddle AgedPlant LectinsAntigens, NeoplasmBiomarkersMembrane GlycoproteinsPlant LectinsReceptors, N-AcetylglucosamineTAA90K protein, humanwisteria lectin

Identifiers

PMID24603981
OpenAlexW2057731751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.