Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24603947›Full record

SynthesisDer Nervenarzt2014

[Schizophrenia and violence].

S Hodgins, R Müller-Isberner

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Der Nervenarzt, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. TheFrontiers in psychiatry · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

S HodginsDépartement de Psychiatrie, Université de Montréal, C.P.6128, Succ. Centre-Ville(Pavillon 3050), Montréal, Québec H3C 3J7, Kanada.
R Müller-Isberner
Université de Montréal · CAVitos · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is now robust evidence that schizophrenia is associated with an increased risk of violence. Across Europe, the numbers of forensic hospital beds have dramatically increased largely due to admissions of men with schizophrenia.

objectiveThis article critically reviews the extant literature on schizophrenia and violence. MATERIAL AND

methodsA systematic review of the literature was carried out.

resultsPeople with schizophrenia are at increased risk, as compared to the general population, to be convicted for violent crimes because they are more likely to engage in aggressive behaviour towards others. While psychotic symptoms explain aggressive behaviour during acute episodes, they do not explain such behaviour at other stages of the illness or prior to onset of illness. Three distinct phenotypes of offenders with schizophrenia have been identified: individuals with a childhood onset of conduct disorder who display antisocial and aggressive behaviour both before and after schizophrenia onset, individuals with no history of conduct problems who begin engaging in aggressive behaviour at the onset of illness, and individuals who engage in a severe physical assault after many years of illness. Little is known about the aetiology of the three types of offenders and about the neural mechanisms that initiate and maintain these forms of behaviour.

conclusionMental health services need to assess the risk of violence among patients with schizophrenia and provide treatments that directly target antisocial and aggressive behaviour.

Indexed as

Schizophrenic PsychologyCausalityEuropeHumansPrevalenceRisk AssessmentSchizophreniaUnited StatesViolence

Identifiers

PMID24603947
OpenAlexW35524912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.