Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24603764›Full record

ArticlePLoS pathogens2014

Genetic dissection of Anopheles gambiae gut epithelial responses to Serratia marcescens.

Stavros Stathopoulos, Daniel E Neafsey, Mara K N Lawniczak, Marc A T Muskavitch, George K Christophides

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS pathogens, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Recovery of metagenomic data from theWellcome open research · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Stavros StathopoulosDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Daniel E NeafseyBroad Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Mara K N LawniczakDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Marc A T MuskavitchBoston College, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts, United States of America.
George K ChristophidesDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom; The Cyprus Institute, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Imperial College London · GBBoston College · USBroad Institute · US

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/E002641/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/K009338/1Medical Research Council G1100339Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 086723/Z/08/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic variation in the mosquito Anopheles gambiae profoundly influences its ability to transmit malaria. Mosquito gut bacteria are shown to influence the outcome of infections with Plasmodium parasites and are also thought to exert a strong drive on genetic variation through natural selection; however, a link between antibacterial effects and genetic variation is yet to emerge. Here, we combined SNP genotyping and expression profiling with phenotypic analyses of candidate genes by RNAi-mediated silencing and 454 pyrosequencing to investigate this intricate biological system. We identified 138 An. gambiae genes to be genetically associated with the outcome of Serratia marcescens infection, including the peptidoglycan recognition receptor PGRPLC that triggers activation of the antibacterial IMD/REL2 pathway and the epidermal growth factor receptor EGFR. Silencing of three genes encoding type III fibronectin domain proteins (FN3Ds) increased the Serratia load and altered the gut microbiota composition in favor of Enterobacteriaceae. These data suggest that natural genetic variation in immune-related genes can shape the bacterial population structure of the mosquito gut with high specificity. Importantly, FN3D2 encodes a homolog of the hypervariable pattern recognition receptor Dscam, suggesting that pathogen-specific recognition may involve a broader family of immune factors. Additionally, we showed that silencing the gene encoding the gustatory receptor Gr9 that is also associated with the Serratia infection phenotype drastically increased Serratia levels. The Gr9 antibacterial activity appears to be related to mosquito feeding behavior and to mostly rely on changes of neuropeptide F expression, together suggesting a behavioral immune response following Serratia infection. Our findings reveal that the mosquito response to oral Serratia infection comprises both an epithelial and a behavioral immune component.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnophelesInsect VectorsIntestinal MucosaOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSerratia InfectionsSerratia marcescensTranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID24603764
PMCPMC3946313
OpenAlexW1985334939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.