Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24603753›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2014

Measuring ERCC1 protein expression in cancer specimens: validation of a novel antibody.

David Hersi Smith, Anne-Marie Kanstrup Fiehn, Louise Fogh, Ib Jarle Christensen, Tine Plato Hansen, Jan Stenvang, Hans Jørgen Nielsen, Kirsten Vang Nielsen, Jane Preuss Hasselby, Nils Brünner and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Double jeopardy: howFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Medullary carcinoma of the colon: can the undifferentiated be differentiated?Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

David Hersi Smith1] R&D, Dako A/S, Produktionsvej 42, DK-2600 Glostrup, Denmark [2] Section for Molecular Disease Biology, Institute of Veterinary Disease Biology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Strandboulevarden 49, DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.
Anne-Marie Kanstrup FiehnDepartment of Pathology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.
Louise FoghSection for Molecular Disease Biology, Institute of Veterinary Disease Biology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Strandboulevarden 49, DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.
Ib Jarle ChristensenFinsen Laboratory, Rigshospitalet and Biotech Research and Innovation Centre (BRIC), University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen Biocenter, Ole Maaloevs Vej 5, building 3, 3rd floor, DK-2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark.
Tine Plato HansenDepartment of Pathology, Odense University Hospital, Winslowparken 15, DK-5000 Odense C, Denmark.
Jan StenvangSection for Molecular Disease Biology, Institute of Veterinary Disease Biology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Strandboulevarden 49, DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.
Hans Jørgen Nielsen1] Department of Surgical Gastroenterology 360, Hvidovre Hospital, Kettegård Allé 30, DK-2650 Hvidovre, Denmark [2] Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3B, DK-2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark.
Kirsten Vang Nielsen1] R&D, Dako A/S, Produktionsvej 42, DK-2600 Glostrup, Denmark [2].
Jane Preuss HasselbyDepartment of Pathology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.
Nils BrünnerSection for Molecular Disease Biology, Institute of Veterinary Disease Biology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Strandboulevarden 49, DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.
Sussie Steen JensenR&D, Dako A/S, Produktionsvej 42, DK-2600 Glostrup, Denmark.
University of Copenhagen · DKCopenhagen University Hospital · DKHvidovre Hospital · DKOdense University Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Platinum chemotherapy remains part of standard therapies in the management of a variety of cancers. Severe side effects and a high degree of resistance to platinum drugs have led numerous researchers to search for predictive biomarkers, which could aid in identifying patients that are the most likely to respond to therapy. The ERCC1-ERCC4 endonuclease plays a critical role in the repair of platinum-DNA damage and has widely been studied in relation to sensitivity to platinum chemotherapy. The standard method to evaluate ERCC1 protein expression is through the use of immunohistochemistry with monoclonal antibody 8F1, an antibody that was recently found to bind an unrelated protein. The present study determines the specificity of a novel antibody, monoclonal antibody 4F9, and presents a method to evaluate ERCC1 expression in colorectal tumor specimens. Using relevant cell lines as controls, the specificity of antibody 4F9 was tested by immunoblotting, immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence. Scoring guidelines to aid in the evaluation of ERCC1 tumor expression were developed and evaluated in archival formalin-fixed paraffin embedded colorectal cancer specimens. Antibody 4F9 was found to be specific by all methods applied and it was possible to evaluate the ERCC1 expression in the majority (85%) of colorectal cancer tumor specimens.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodiesAntibody SpecificityCell Line, TumorCohort StudiesDNA-Binding ProteinsEndonucleasesFemaleGene ExpressionHumansImmunohistochemistryMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsAntibodiesDNA-Binding ProteinsEndonucleasesERCC1 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID24603753
PMCPMC3945488
OpenAlexW2090976895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.