Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24603485›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Morphology and efficiency of a specialized foraging behavior, sediment sifting, in neotropical cichlid fishes.

Hernán López-Fernández, Jessica Arbour, Stuart Willis, Crystal Watkins, Rodney L Honeycutt, Kirk O Winemiller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hernán López-FernándezProgram in Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, and Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America; Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jessica ArbourDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Stuart WillisProgram in Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, and Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America.
Crystal WatkinsProgram in Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, and Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America.
Rodney L HoneycuttProgram in Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, and Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America.
Kirk O WinemillerProgram in Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, and Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding of relationships between morphology and ecological performance can help to reveal how natural selection drives biological diversification. We investigate relationships between feeding behavior, foraging performance and morphology within a diverse group of teleost fishes, and examine the extent to which associations can be explained by evolutionary relatedness. Morphological adaptation associated with sediment sifting was examined using a phylogenetic linear discriminant analysis on a set of ecomorphological traits from 27 species of Neotropical cichlids. For most sifting taxa, feeding behavior could be effectively predicted by a linear discriminant function of ecomorphology across multiple clades of sediment sifters, and this pattern could not be explained by shared evolutionary history alone. Additionally, we tested foraging efficiency in seven Neotropical cichlid species, five of which are specialized benthic feeders with differing head morphology. Efficiency was evaluated based on the degree to which invertebrate prey could be retrieved at different depths of sediment. Feeding performance was compared both with respect to feeding mode and species using a phylogenetic ANCOVA, with substrate depth as a covariate. Benthic foraging performance was constant across sediment depths in non-sifters but declined with depth in sifters. The non-sifting Hypsophrys used sweeping motions of the body and fins to excavate large pits to uncover prey; this tactic was more efficient for consuming deeply buried invertebrates than observed among sediment sifters. Findings indicate that similar feeding performance among sediment-sifting cichlids extracting invertebrate prey from shallow sediment layers reflects constraints associated with functional morphology and, to a lesser extent, phylogeny.

Indexed as

Tropical ClimateAdaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsBiological EvolutionCichlidsDiscriminant AnalysisEcosystemFeeding BehaviorPhylogenySelection, GeneticSpecies Specificity

Identifiers

PMID24603485
PMCPMC3945966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.