Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24603072›Full record

Trial reportStroke2014

Targeting recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator in acute ischemic stroke based on risk of intracranial hemorrhage or poor functional outcome: an analysis of the third international stroke trial.

William N Whiteley, Douglas Thompson, Gordon Murray, Geoff Cohen, Richard I Lindley, Joanna Wardlaw, Peter Sandercock, IST-3 Collaborative Group

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Stroke, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Therapeutic management of ischemic stroke.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

William N WhiteleyFrom the Divisions of Clinical Neurosciences (W.N.W., G.C., P.S.) and Neuroimaging Sciences (J.W.), University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Edinburgh MRC Hub for Trials Methodology Research, Centre for Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom (D.T., G.M.); and Neurological and Mental Health Division, The George Institute for Global Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia (R.I.L.).
Douglas Thompson
Gordon Murray
Geoff Cohen
Richard I Lindley
Joanna Wardlaw
Peter Sandercock
IST-3 Collaborative Group
University of Edinburgh · GBUniversity of Sydney · AU

Funding

Medical Research Council EME 09-800-15Medical Research Council G0400069Medical Research Council G0800803Medical Research Council G0902303Medical Research Council MR/K026992/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeIntravenous recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (r-tPA), despite a risk of early symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), is of net clinical benefit to acute stroke patients. We tested if predictive models could identify patients least likely to be harmed by sICH or those who gained no net benefit.

methodsWe used the Third International Stroke Trial (IST-3) trial data set, an international, multicenter, open treatment randomized trial of 0.9 mg/kg r-tPA versus control in 3035 patients with acute ischemic stroke. We compared the discrimination and calibration of previously developed predictive models for ICH and poststroke poor outcome and developed a new model using variables selected by systematic review. We calculated the absolute and relative risk reduction of death or dependency with r-tPA in patients at a low, medium, or high predicted risk of sICH or poor functional outcome.

resultsPrediction models for sICH or poor outcome (Hemorrhage After Thrombolysis [HAT]; Sugar, Early Infarct Signs, Dense Artery, Age, National Institutes of Health (NIH) Stroke Score (SEDAN); Glucose Race Age Sex Pressure Stroke Severity [GRASPS]; Stroke Thrombolytic Predictive Instrument; Dense Artery, Rankin Score, Age, Glucose, Onset to Treatment Time, NIHSS [DRAGON]; Totaled Health Risks in Vascular Events [THRIVE]; our new model; and a model with National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale and age) had similar area under receiver operator characteristic curves (AUROCC) to predict sICH (P for difference >0.05). The simplest model (with covariates National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale and age) predicted both sICH (AUROCC, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.58-0.68) and poststroke poor functional outcome (AUROCC, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.77-0.82) similarly to complex models. There was no evidence that the effect of r-tPA in patients at high predicted risk of sICH or poor functional outcome after stroke was less than in those at lower risk.

conclusionsThere is a clinically relevant net positive effect of r-tPA in patients with acute stroke at a high predicted risk of sICH or poor functional outcome. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL: http://www.controlled-trials.com. Unique identifier: ISRCTN25765518.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFibrinolytic AgentsHumansIntracranial HemorrhagesLogistic ModelsMalePredictive Value of TestsRecombinant ProteinsRecovery of FunctionRisk FactorsROC CurveStrokeTissue Plasminogen ActivatorFibrinolytic AgentsRecombinant ProteinsTissue Plasminogen Activatorprognosisrandomized controlled trialstrokethrombolytic therapy

Identifiers

PMID24603072
PMCPMC4282175
OpenAlexW2019022837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.