Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24602997›Full record

Trial reportPain2014

Partial reinforcement, extinction, and placebo analgesia.

Siu Tsin Au Yeung, Ben Colagiuri, Peter F Lovibond, Luana Colloca

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Pain, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. A Reliable Effect of Alexithymia, but Not Autism, on Placebo Hypoalgesia.Autism : the international journal of research and practice · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The Placebo Effect in Psychosis: Why It Matters and How to Measure It.Biological psychiatry global open science · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Siu Tsin Au YeungSchool of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia National Institute of Mental Health and National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM), National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Ben Colagiuri
Peter F Lovibond
Luana Colloca
UNSW Sydney · AUNational Center for Complementary and Integrative Health · USUniversity of Sydney · AU

Funding

Mechanisms of pain and placebo analgesiaZIAAT000019 · NCCIH · NATIONAL CENTER FOR COMPLEMENTARY & INTEGRATIVE HEALTH · PI GRILLON, CHRISTIAN · 2012 to 2014
$1.3M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 AT999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Numerous studies indicate that placebo analgesia can be established via conditioning procedures. However, these studies have exclusively involved conditioning under continuous reinforcement. Thus, it is currently unknown whether placebo analgesia can be established under partial reinforcement and how durable any such effect would be. We tested this possibility using electrocutaneous pain in healthy volunteers. Sixty undergraduates received placebo treatment (activation of a sham electrode) under the guise of an analgesic trial. The participants were randomly allocated to different conditioning schedules, namely continuous reinforcement (CRF), partial reinforcement (PRF), or control (no conditioning). Conditioning was achieved by surreptitiously reducing pain intensity during training when the placebo was activated compared with when it was inactive. For the CRF group, the placebo was always followed by a surreptitious reduction in pain during training. For the PRF group, the placebo was followed by a reduction in pain stimulation on 62.5% of trials only. In the test phase, pain stimulation was equivalent across placebo and no placebo trials. Both CRF and PRF produced placebo analgesia, with the magnitude of initial analgesia being larger after CRF. However, although the placebo analgesia established under CRF extinguished during test phase, the placebo analgesia established under PRF did not. These findings indicate that PRF can induce placebo analgesia and that these effects are more resistant to extinction than those established via CRF. PRF may therefore reflect a novel way of enhancing clinical outcomes via the placebo effect.

Indexed as

Extinction, PsychologicalPlacebo EffectReinforcement, PsychologyAdolescentAnalgesiaFemaleHumansMalePain MeasurementTranscutaneous Electric Nerve StimulationYoung AdultConditioningExpectancyExtinctionPainPartial reinforcementPlacebo effect

Identifiers

PMID24602997
PMCPMC4025912
OpenAlexW1992384900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.