ArticleJournal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons2014
Skeletal and soft tissue response to automated, continuous, curvilinear distraction osteogenesis.
Article in Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mandibular distraction osteogenesis assisted by cell-based tissue engineering: a systematic review.Orthodontics & craniofacial research · 2015Pooled it
- A Novel Alveolar Distractor Incorporating Nickel-Titanium Alloy Springs: A Preliminary In Vitro Study.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Review of automatic continuous distraction osteogenesis devices for mandibular reconstruction applications.Biomedical engineering online · 2020Review
- Continuous distraction osteogenesis device with MAAC controller for mandibular reconstruction applications.Biomedical engineering online · 2019Article
- Bilateral Continuous Automated Distraction Osteogenesis: Proof of Principle.The Journal of craniofacial surgery · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo document the bone formation and soft tissue changes in response to automated, continuous, curvilinear distraction osteogenesis (DO) at rates greater than 1 mm/day in a minipig model. MATERIALS AND
methodsTwo groups of Yucatan minipigs underwent automated, continuous, curvilinear DO of the right mandible: group A, 1.5 mm/day (n = 5); and group B, 3.0 mm/day (n = 5). Each minipig underwent 12 mm of distraction followed by 24 days of fixation. The distracted and contralateral mandibles were harvested at the end of fixation. The percentage of surface area (PSA) of the regenerate occupied by bone, fibrous tissue, cartilage, and hematoma was determined using computerized histomorphometric analysis. The control groups consisted of DO wounds distracted discontinuously at 1 mm/day and the nonoperated contralateral mandible. The ipsilateral and contralateral digastric muscles were harvested and stained for proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), myogenic differentiation-1 (MyoD), and paired Box 7 protein (PAX7).
resultsAll 10 minipigs completed the distraction and fixation period. The PSA occupied by bone was similar for groups A (PSA 64.36% ± 5.87%) and B (PSA 63.83% ± 3.37%) and the control group (1 mm/day; PSA 64.89% ± 0.56%) but was less than that on the nonoperated side (PSA 84.67% ± 0.86%). The PSA occupied by cartilage and hematoma in all groups was minimal (<1.1%). The digastric muscles had no abnormal tissue or inflammation, and PAX7, MyoD, and PCNA expression had returned to the baseline levels.
conclusionsThe results of the present study indicate that bone formation in response to automated, continuous, and curvilinear DO at a rate of 1.5 and 3.0 mm/day is nearly identical to that with discontinuous DO at 1 mm/day. In addition, no deleterious effects were found on the digastric muscles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.