Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24602543›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS2014

The social buffering effect of playful handling on responses to repeated intraperitoneal injections in laboratory rats.

Sylvie Cloutier, Kim Wahl, Chelsea Baker, Ruth C Newberry

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Tickling, a Technique for Inducing Positive Affect When Handling Rats.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sylvie CloutierCenter for the Study of Animal Well-being, Department of Integrative Physiology and Neuroscience, Pullman, Washington, DC, USA. scloutie@vetmed.wsu.edu.
Kim WahlCenter for the Study of Animal Well-being, Department of Integrative Physiology and Neuroscience, Pullman, Washington, DC, USA.
Chelsea BakerCenter for the Study of Animal Well-being, Department of Integrative Physiology and Neuroscience, Pullman, Washington, DC, USA.
Ruth C NewberryCenter for the Study of Animal Well-being, Department of Integrative Physiology and Neuroscience, Pullman, Washington, DC, USA; Department of Animal and Aquacultural Sciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway.
Washington State University · USNorwegian University of Life Sciences · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Handling small animals for veterinary and experimental procedures can negatively affect animal wellbeing. We hypothesized that playful handling (tickling) would decrease stress associated with repeated injections in adult laboratory rats, especially those with prior tickling experience. We compared responses of 4 groups of male Sprague-Dawley rats to intraperitoneal injection of saline daily for 10 d. Rats either tickled or not tickled as juveniles (2 min/d for 21 d) were exposed as adults to either a passive hand or tickling for 2 min immediately before and after injections. Rates of vocalization (22- and 50-kHz ultrasonic vocalizations (USV), indicative of negative and positive affective states, respectively, and audible calls indicative of pain and discomfort) were quantified before, during, and after injection. Tickling before and after injection, especially when combined with juvenile tickling experience (ending 40 to 50 d earlier), increased 50-kHz USV rates before and after injection, reduced audible call rate during injection, and decreased the duration of the injection procedure. The treatments did not affect indicators of physiologic stress (body weight change; fecal corticosteroid levels). We conclude that playful handling performed in association with a mildly aversive procedure serves as a useful refinement by inducing a positive affective state that mitigates the aversiveness of the procedure and makes rats easier to handle, especially when they have been accustomed to tickling as juveniles.

Indexed as

Animal WelfareHandling, PsychologicalAnimal HusbandryAnimalsInjections, IntraperitonealMalePlay and PlaythingsRandom AllocationRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyStress, PhysiologicalStress, PsychologicalUltrasonicsVocalization, Animal

Identifiers

PMID24602543
PMCPMC3966273
OpenAlexW80596329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.