Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24600507›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery2014

Prediction and diagnosis of colorectal anastomotic leakage: A systematic review of literature.

Freek Daams, Zhouqiao Wu, Max Jef Lahaye, Johannus Jeekel, Johan Frederik Lange

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 49 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03760939 naterminatednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Clinical and Economical Evaluation of Colorectal Surgery in Ambulatory Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorIHU StrasbourgRan2019 to 2024Enrolled5ConditionsColorectal SurgeryArmsClinical and economical evaluation
NCT07144969 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of the Effect of Chewing Gum and Honey on Postoperative Recovery and Complications in Ileostomy Reversal

TypeinterventionalSponsorMayo Hospital LahoreRan2024 to 2024Enrolled60ConditionsIleostomy Closure, Gum Chewing, Honey, Postoperative RecoveryArmsHoney, gum chewing
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 113 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Freek DaamsFreek Daams, Department of Surgery, Catharina Ziekenhuis, Postbus 1350, 5602 ZA Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Zhouqiao WuFreek Daams, Department of Surgery, Catharina Ziekenhuis, Postbus 1350, 5602 ZA Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Max Jef LahayeFreek Daams, Department of Surgery, Catharina Ziekenhuis, Postbus 1350, 5602 ZA Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Johannus JeekelFreek Daams, Department of Surgery, Catharina Ziekenhuis, Postbus 1350, 5602 ZA Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Johan Frederik LangeFreek Daams, Department of Surgery, Catharina Ziekenhuis, Postbus 1350, 5602 ZA Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although many studies have focused on the preoperative risk factors of anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery (CAL), postoperative delay in diagnosis is common and harmful. This review provides a systematic overview of all available literature on diagnostic tools used for CAL. A systematic search of literature was undertaken using Medline, Embase, Cochrane and Web-of-Science libraries. Articles were selected when a diagnostic or prediction tool for CAL was described and tested. Two reviewers separately assessed the eligibility and level of evidence of the papers. Sixty-nine articles were selected (clinical methods: 11, laboratory tests: 12, drain fluid analysis: 12, intraoperative techniques: 22, radiology: 16). Clinical scoring leads to early awareness of probability of CAL and reduces delay of diagnosis. C-reactive protein measurement at postoperative day 3-4 is helpful. CAL patients are characterized by elevated cytokine levels in drain fluid in the very early postoperative phase in CAL patients. Intraoperative testing using the air leak test allows intraoperative repair of the anastomosis. Routine contrast enema is not recommended. If CAL is clinically suspected, rectal contrast-computer tomography is recommended by a few studies. In many studies a "no-test" control group was lacking, furthermore no golden standard for CAL is available. These two factors contributed to a relatively low level of evidence in the majority of the papers. This paper provides a systematic overview of literature on the available tools for diagnosing CAL. The study shows that colorectal surgery patients could benefit from some diagnostic interventions that can easily be performed in daily postoperative care.

Indexed as

AnastomosisColorectalDiagnosisLeakagePrediction

Identifiers

PMID24600507
PMCPMC3942535
OpenAlexW1963917824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.