Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24600390›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroengineering2014

Improved selectivity from a wavelength addressable device for wireless stimulation of neural tissue.

Elif Ç Seymour, David S Freedman, Mutlu Gökkavas, Ekmel Ozbay, Mesut Sahin, M Selim Unlü

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroengineering, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Elif Ç SeymourDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston MA, USA.
David S FreedmanDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Boston University, Boston MA, USA.
Mutlu GökkavasNanotechnology Research Center, Bilkent University Ankara, Turkey.
Ekmel OzbayNanotechnology Research Center, Bilkent University Ankara, Turkey.
Mesut SahinDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark NJ, USA.
M Selim UnlüDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston MA, USA ; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Boston University, Boston MA, USA.
Boston University · USBilkent University · TRNew Jersey Institute of Technology · US

Funding

Floating Light Activated Micro-Electrical Stimulators for Neural ProstheticsR01EB009100 · NIBIB · NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI SAHIN, MESUT · 2009 to 2012
$1.3M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB009100
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrical neural stimulation with micro electrodes is a promising technique for restoring lost functions in the central nervous system as a result of injury or disease. One of the problems related to current neural stimulators is the tissue response due to the connecting wires and the presence of a rigid electrode inside soft neural tissue. We have developed a novel, optically activated, microscale photovoltaic neurostimulator based on a custom layered compound semiconductor heterostructure that is both wireless and has a comparatively small volume (<0.01 mm(3)). Optical activation provides a wireless means of energy transfer to the neurostimulator, eliminating wires and the associated complications. This neurostimulator was shown to evoke action potentials and a functional motor response in the rat spinal cord. In this work, we extend our design to include wavelength selectivity and thus allowing independent activation of devices. As a proof of concept, we fabricated two different microscale devices with different spectral responsivities in the near-infrared region. We assessed the improved addressability of individual devices via wavelength selectivity as compared to spatial selectivity alone through on-bench optical measurements of the devices in combination with an in vivo light intensity profile in the rat cortex obtained in a previous study. We show that wavelength selectivity improves the individual addressability of the floating stimulators, thus increasing the number of devices that can be implanted in close proximity to each other.

Indexed as

addressable stimulatorsfloating micro electrodesneural prosthesesoptically poweredoptical neural stimulationwireless

Identifiers

PMID24600390
PMCPMC3927122
OpenAlexW2126482975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.