Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24600389›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroinformatics2014

Stimfit: quantifying electrophysiological data with Python.

Segundo J Guzman, Alois Schlögl, Christoph Schmidt-Hieber

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroinformatics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 103 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
103citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

103 citing papers in PubMed, 183 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. GABAeNeuro · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Phylogenetic divergence of GABANature communications · 2025
    Article
  11. GABAFrontiers in synaptic neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Molecular genetics and metabolism reports · 2024
    Article
  20. Article

43 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Segundo J GuzmanInstitute of Science and Technology Austria Klosterneuburg, Austria.
Alois SchlöglInstitute of Science and Technology Austria Klosterneuburg, Austria.
Christoph Schmidt-HieberWolfson Institute for Biomedical Research, University College London London, UK ; Department of Neuroscience, Physiology and Pharmacology, University College London London, UK.
Institute of Science and Technology Austria · ATWolfson Foundation · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intracellular electrophysiological recordings provide crucial insights into elementary neuronal signals such as action potentials and synaptic currents. Analyzing and interpreting these signals is essential for a quantitative understanding of neuronal information processing, and requires both fast data visualization and ready access to complex analysis routines. To achieve this goal, we have developed Stimfit, a free software package for cellular neurophysiology with a Python scripting interface and a built-in Python shell. The program supports most standard file formats for cellular neurophysiology and other biomedical signals through the Biosig library. To quantify and interpret the activity of single neurons and communication between neurons, the program includes algorithms to characterize the kinetics of presynaptic action potentials and postsynaptic currents, estimate latencies between pre- and postsynaptic events, and detect spontaneously occurring events. We validate and benchmark these algorithms, give estimation errors, and provide sample use cases, showing that Stimfit represents an efficient, accessible and extensible way to accurately analyze and interpret neuronal signals.

Indexed as

biosignal data formatsC++data analysiselectrophysiologyfree softwarepatch-clampPython

Identifiers

PMID24600389
PMCPMC3931263
OpenAlexW2164070717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.