Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24600203›Full record

ReviewBiologics : targets & therapy2014

Update on the use of systemic biologic agents in the treatment of noninfectious uveitis.

Sirichai Pasadhika, James T Rosenbaum

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biologics : targets & therapy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05349747 (Outcome of Treatment of Uveitis With Biologic Drugs in Resistant Cases Vogt-koyanagi-Harada Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 42 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
14.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05349747 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Outcome of Treatment of Uveitis With Biologic Drugs in Resistant Cases Vogt-koyanagi-Harada Disease

TypeobservationalSponsorAssiut UniversityRan2022 to 2024Enrolled50ConditionsUveitisArmsBiologic drugs
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 123 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Noninfectious uveitis: Management with biologic agents.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Optimizing Behçet Uveitis Management: A Review of Personalized Immunosuppressive Strategies.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Pathogenesis and current therapies for non-infectious uveitis.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sirichai PasadhikaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Southern Arizona Veterans Administration Health Care System, Tucson, AZ, USA.
James T RosenbaumLegacy Devers Eye Institute, Portland, OR, USA.
Legacy Health · USSouthern Arizona VA Health Care System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Uveitis is one of the leading causes of blindness worldwide. Noninfectious uveitis may be associated with other systemic conditions, such as human leukocyte antigen B27-related spondyloarthropathies, inflammatory bowel disease, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, Behçet's disease, and sarcoidosis. Conventional therapy with corticosteroids and immunosuppressive agents (such as methotrexate, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, and cyclosporine) may not be sufficient to control ocular inflammation or prevent non-ophthalmic complications in refractory patients. Off-label use of biologic response modifiers has been studied as primary and secondary therapeutic agents. They are very useful when conventional immunosuppressive therapy has failed or has been poorly tolerated, or to treat concomitant ophthalmic and systemic inflammation that might benefit from these medications. Biologic therapy, primarily infliximab, and adalimumab, have been shown to be rapidly effective for the treatment of various subtypes of refractory uveitis and retinal vasculitis, especially Behçet's disease-related eye conditions and the uveitis associated with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Other agents such as golimumab, abatacept, canakinumab, gevokizumab, tocilizumab, and alemtuzumab may have great future promise for the treatment of uveitis. It has been shown that with proper monitoring, biologic therapy can significantly improve quality of life in patients with uveitis, particularly those with concurrent systemic symptoms. However, given high cost as well as the limited long-term safety data, we do not routinely recommend biologics as first-line therapy for noninfectious uveitis in most patients. These agents should be used with caution by experienced clinicians. The present work aims to provide a broad and updated review of the current and in-development systemic biologic agents for the treatment of noninfectious uveitis.

Indexed as

biologicseyemonoclonal antibody

Identifiers

PMID24600203
PMCPMC3933243
OpenAlexW2054926473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.