Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24600039›Full record

ReviewMicrobiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR2014

Bacterial genome instability.

Elise Darmon, David R F Leach

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 207 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
207citing papers in PubMed
18.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

207 citing papers in PubMed, 401 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Unlocking genome engineering inMicrobiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  8. Genomic and proteomic analyses of the maize root isolateApplied and environmental microbiology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Plasmid mutation rates scale with copy number.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Hallmarks of Bacterial Vaginosis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review

147 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elise DarmonAddress correspondence to David R. F. Leach, d.leach@ed.ac.uk.
David R F Leach
University of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0901622
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial genomes are remarkably stable from one generation to the next but are plastic on an evolutionary time scale, substantially shaped by horizontal gene transfer, genome rearrangement, and the activities of mobile DNA elements. This implies the existence of a delicate balance between the maintenance of genome stability and the tolerance of genome instability. In this review, we describe the specialized genetic elements and the endogenous processes that contribute to genome instability. We then discuss the consequences of genome instability at the physiological level, where cells have harnessed instability to mediate phase and antigenic variation, and at the evolutionary level, where horizontal gene transfer has played an important role. Indeed, this ability to share DNA sequences has played a major part in the evolution of life on Earth. The evolutionary plasticity of bacterial genomes, coupled with the vast numbers of bacteria on the planet, substantially limits our ability to control disease.

Indexed as

Genome, BacterialGenomic InstabilityAntigenic VariationBiological EvolutionDNA Transposable ElementsGene Transfer, HorizontalHomologous RecombinationInteinsInverted Repeat SequencesDNA Transposable Elements

Identifiers

PMID24600039
PMCPMC3957733
OpenAlexW2158423461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.