ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2014
Molecular method development and establishment of a database for clinical and epidemiological herpes simplex virus 1 strain comparisons.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Previous methods of herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) genotype analysis have lacked sufficient discriminatory power for strain analysis within genotypes. The hypervariable reiterative repeat regions in the US1 and US12 introns, known as ReIV, were targeted for strain comparison. PCR methods for these extremely GC-rich target regions were optimized to give reproducible amplicons that were visualized by capillary electrophoresis relative to size standards. Analysis of the size, shape, and pattern of the resulting signatures enabled strain discrimination. Primary clinical specimens were used to develop the assay and the analysis algorithm. A blinded clinical study of 147 in-state and 51 out-of-state samples, including matched specimen-isolate pairs, was then performed. All primary clinical samples had been collected between 2004 and 2011 for viral diagnosis and previously found to be positive for HSV-1 by real-time PCR. The combined database contained patterns from 264 samples collected from 199 patients with a total of 176 unique signatures, none of which were dominant in the population. Matches between the signatures of the more than 50 specimen-isolate pairs were always seen. Signatures also matched across multiple samples collected from individual patients (six such cases), as well as some additional signature matches where epidemiological links were likely. Results were reproducible on repeat testing of individual specimens, even after months in frozen storage. The protocol has multiple potential clinical and public health uses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.