Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24599978›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2014

Major variation in MICs of tigecycline in Gram-negative bacilli as a function of testing method.

Dror Marchaim, Jason M Pogue, Oran Tzuman, Kayoko Hayakawa, Paul R Lephart, Hossein Salimnia, Theresa Painter, Marcus J Zervos, Laura E Johnson, Mary Beth Perri and 11 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. First report of a carbapenem-resistantCurrent research in microbial sciences · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Genomic insights intoFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Emergence of eravacycline heteroresistance in carbapenem-resistantFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Carbapenem-resistantFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Dror MarchaimDivision of Infectious Diseases, Detroit Medical Center, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Jason M Pogue
Oran Tzuman
Kayoko Hayakawa
Paul R Lephart
Hossein Salimnia
Theresa Painter
Marcus J Zervos
Laura E Johnson
Mary Beth Perri
Pamela Hartman
Rama V Thyagarajan
Sharon Major
Melanie Goodell
Mohamad G Fakih
Laraine L Washer
Duane W Newton
Anurag N Malani
Jason M Wholehan
Lona Mody
Keith S Kaye
Detroit Medical Center · USBeaumont Hospital, Dearborn · USHenry Ford Health System · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USTrinity Health Michigan · USAssaf Harofeh Medical Center · ILSt. John Hospital & Medical Center · USTel Aviv University · ILWayne State University · US

Funding

Research Education CoreP30AG024824 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Neil Alexander · 2004 to 2026
$29.2M
Pathway from Functional Disability to Antimicrobial Resistance in Nursing HomesR01AG041780 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MODY, LONA · 2013 to 2017
$1.8M
Targeted Infection Prevention (TIP) Program in Nursing HomesR01AG032298 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MODY, LONA · 2009 to 2013
$1.7M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG024824NIA NIH HHS R01 AG032298NIA NIH HHS R01 AG041780
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tigecycline is one of the few remaining therapeutic options for extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Gram-negative bacilli (GNB). MICs of tigecycline to Acinetobacter baumannii have been reported to be elevated when determined by the Etest compared to determinations by the broth microdilution (BMD) method. The study aim was to compare the susceptibility of GNB to tigecycline by four different testing methods. GNB were collected from six health care systems (25 hospitals) in southeast Michigan from January 2010 to September 2011. Tigecycline MICs among A. baumannii, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE), extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae, and susceptible Enterobacteriaceae isolates were determined by Etest, BMD, Vitek-2, and MicroScan. Nonsusceptibility was categorized as a tigecycline MIC of ≥4 μg/ml for both A. baumannii and Enterobacteriaceae. The study included 4,427 isolates: 2,065 ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae, 1,105 A. baumannii, 888 susceptible Enterobacteriaceae, and 369 CRE isolates. Tigecycline nonsusceptibility among A. baumannii isolates was significantly more common as determined by Etest compared to that determined by BMD (odds ratio [OR], 10.3; P<0.001), MicroScan (OR, 12.4; P<0.001), or Vitek-2 (OR, 9.4; P<0.001). These differences were not evident with the other pathogens. Tigecycline MICs varied greatly according to the in vitro testing methods among A. baumannii isolates. Etest should probably not be used by laboratories for tigecycline MIC testing of A. baumannii isolates, since MICs are significantly elevated with Etest compared to those determined by the three other methods.

Indexed as

Acinetobacter baumanniiAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamasesCarbapenemsEnterobacteriaceaeGram-Negative BacteriaHumansMichiganMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMinocyclineTigecyclineAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamasesCarbapenemsMinocyclineTigecycline

Identifiers

PMID24599978
PMCPMC3993642
OpenAlexW2147216357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.