Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24599946›Full record

ArticleJournal of vision2014

More target features in visual working memory leads to poorer search guidance: evidence from contralateral delay activity.

Joseph Schmidt, Annmarie MacNamara, Greg Hajcak Proudfit, Gregory J Zelinsky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vision, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. How expectations alter search performance.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Eye movements reflect expertise development in hybrid search.Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Specifying the precision of guiding features for visual search.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Adding details to the attentional template offsets search difficulty: Evidence from contralateral delay activity.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance · 2017
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Joseph SchmidtInstitute for Mind and Brain, Department of Psychology, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Annmarie MacNamara
Greg Hajcak Proudfit
Gregory J Zelinsky

Funding

Training in the Neuroscience of Mental HealthT32MH067631 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI RASENICK, MARK M. · 2004 to 2024
$4.8M
Eye movements during real-world visual search: A behavioral & computational studyR01MH063748 · NIMH · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI ZELINSKY, GREGORY J · 2002 to 2013
$1.9M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH063748NIMH NIH HHS R01-MH063748NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH067631NIMH NIH HHS T32MH067631-09
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The visual-search literature has assumed that the top-down target representation used to guide search resides in visual working memory (VWM). We directly tested this assumption using contralateral delay activity (CDA) to estimate the VWM load imposed by the target representation. In Experiment 1, observers previewed four photorealistic objects and were cued to remember the two objects appearing to the left or right of central fixation; Experiment 2 was identical except that observers previewed two photorealistic objects and were cued to remember one. CDA was measured during a delay following preview offset but before onset of a four-object search array. One of the targets was always present, and observers were asked to make an eye movement to it and press a button. We found lower magnitude CDA on trials when the initial search saccade was directed to the target (strong guidance) compared to when it was not (weak guidance). This difference also tended to be larger shortly before search-display onset and was largely unaffected by VWM item-capacity limits or number of previews. Moreover, the difference between mean strong- and weak-guidance CDA was proportional to the increase in search time between mean strong-and weak-guidance trials (as measured by time-to-target and reaction-time difference scores). Contrary to most search models, our data suggest that trials resulting in the maintenance of more target features results in poor search guidance to a target. We interpret these counterintuitive findings as evidence for strong search guidance using a small set of highly discriminative target features that remain after pruning from a larger set of features, with the load imposed on VWM varying with this feature-consolidation process.

Indexed as

CuesAdultEye MovementsHumansMemory, Short-TermPattern Recognition, VisualReaction TimeVisual PerceptionYoung Adultcontralateral delay activity (CDA)event-related potentials (ERPs)guidancetarget representationvisual searchvisual working memory capacityvisual working memory (VWM)

Identifiers

PMID24599946
PMCPMC3944715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.