ArticleJournal of vision2014
More target features in visual working memory leads to poorer search guidance: evidence from contralateral delay activity.
Article in Journal of vision, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The contralateral delay activity as a neural measure of visual working memory.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2016Pooled it
- How expectations alter search performance.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2025Article
- Assessing satisfaction of search in virtual mammograms for experienced and novice searchers.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2023Article
- Are all real-world objects created equal? Estimating the "set-size" of the search target in visual working memory.Psychophysiology · 2022Article
- From "satisfaction of search" to "subsequent search misses": a review of multiple-target search errors across radiology and cognitive science.Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2021Review
- Eye movements reflect expertise development in hybrid search.Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2021Article
- Action Real-Time Strategy Gaming Experience Related to Enhanced Capacity of Visual Working Memory.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2020Article
- Specifying the precision of guiding features for visual search.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance · 2019Article
- Contralateral delay activity tracks the storage of visually presented letters and words.Psychophysiology · 2019Article
- Adding details to the attentional template offsets search difficulty: Evidence from contralateral delay activity.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance · 2017Article
- Searching for Category-Consistent Features: A Computational Approach to Understanding Visual Category Representation.Psychological science · 2016Article
- The what, where, and why of priority maps and their interactions with visual working memory.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The visual-search literature has assumed that the top-down target representation used to guide search resides in visual working memory (VWM). We directly tested this assumption using contralateral delay activity (CDA) to estimate the VWM load imposed by the target representation. In Experiment 1, observers previewed four photorealistic objects and were cued to remember the two objects appearing to the left or right of central fixation; Experiment 2 was identical except that observers previewed two photorealistic objects and were cued to remember one. CDA was measured during a delay following preview offset but before onset of a four-object search array. One of the targets was always present, and observers were asked to make an eye movement to it and press a button. We found lower magnitude CDA on trials when the initial search saccade was directed to the target (strong guidance) compared to when it was not (weak guidance). This difference also tended to be larger shortly before search-display onset and was largely unaffected by VWM item-capacity limits or number of previews. Moreover, the difference between mean strong- and weak-guidance CDA was proportional to the increase in search time between mean strong-and weak-guidance trials (as measured by time-to-target and reaction-time difference scores). Contrary to most search models, our data suggest that trials resulting in the maintenance of more target features results in poor search guidance to a target. We interpret these counterintuitive findings as evidence for strong search guidance using a small set of highly discriminative target features that remain after pruning from a larger set of features, with the load imposed on VWM varying with this feature-consolidation process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.