Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24599711›Full record

ReviewJournal of religion and health2014

Phase changes in the BRCA policy domain.

Stephen M Modell, Susan B King, Toby Citrin, Sharon L R Kardia

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of religion and health, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Cancer Survivorship Care: An Opportunity to Revisit Cancer Genetics.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Stephen M ModellDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA, mod@umich.edu.
Susan B King
Toby Citrin
Sharon L R Kardia

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recent US Supreme Court ruling against gene patenting has been accompanied by the passage at the federal level of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, both events representing a thawing or phase change in policies that will now make preventive techniques, such as BRCA genetic testing to predict risk for familial breast and ovarian cancer, more affordable and accessible. Authors including Yun-Han Huang in this journal have noted the judicial ruling is one step--a significant one--in the process of patent system reform. This commentary links such changes with policy formation and action taken by members of diverse religious communities in the aftermath of the Human Genome Project and continuing in today's genome sequencing area. Religious engagement has acted as a catalyzing force for change in the creation and dissemination of genetic developments. Religious perspectives are needed to solve the new ethical dilemmas posed by population screening for BRCA mutations and the rise of direct-to-consumer and provider marketing of such genetic tests, which have far-reaching consequences at the individual, family, and societal levels.

Indexed as

Philosophy, MedicalReligion and PsychologyBRCA2 ProteinBreast NeoplasmsEthics, MedicalFemaleGenetic TestingHealth Care ReformHealth PolicyHealth Services AccessibilityHumansOvarian NeoplasmsPatents as TopicPatient Protection and Affordable Care ActUbiquitin-Protein LigasesBRAP protein, humanBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, humanUbiquitin-Protein Ligases

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.