Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24599674›Full record

SynthesisTumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine2014

Metastasis-associated protein 1 as a new prognostic marker for solid tumors: a meta-analysis of cohort studies.

Haiqing Luo, Hongjiao Li, Na Yao, Liren Hu, Taiping He

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Haiqing LuoCenter of Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical College, Zhanjiang, Guangdong, 524001, China.
Hongjiao Li
Na Yao
Liren Hu
Taiping He
Guangdong Medical College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metastasis-associated protein 1 (MTA1) is a molecular marker in various solid tumors that has recently been investigated. The prognostic significance of MAT1 expression remains controversial. In this work, we aimed to determine the relationship between immunohistochemistry-detected MAT1 expression and survival of patients with solid tumors by conducting a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Relevant studies were identified via an electronic database search updated on October 28, 2013. We included cohort studies that reported hazard ratios (HRs) or odds ratios (ORs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) to determine the association of high MTA1 expression with overall survival (OS) and clinicopathological characteristics. Heterogeneity was quantified using I (2) statistics, and publication bias was evaluated using funnel plots. Sensitivity analysis was conducted to evaluate the robustness of meta-analysis findings. We identified 16 cohort studies that focused on MTA1 overexpression and prognosis involving 2,253 cancer patients. Overall, the combined HR for OS was 1.85 (95 % CI: 1.55-2.28, P<0.001). Omission of any single study had no significant effect on the pooled HR estimate. When the studies were stratified by tumor type, similar results of poor prognosis were observed in non-small cell lung cancer (HR=2.05, 95 % CI: 1.14-3.68, P=0.016) and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (HR=1.86, 95 % CI: 1.44-2.39, P<0.001). Moreover, multivariate survival analysis showed that MTA1 overexpression was an independent predictor of poor prognosis (HR=1.90, 95 % CI: 1.53-2.37, P<0.001). In addtional, MTA1 overexpression was significantly associated with tumor size (OR=2.72, 95 % CI=1.44-5.14, P=0.002), tumor stage (OR=2.44, 95 % CI=1.67-3.57, P<0.001), depth of invasion (OR=2.63, 95 % CI=1.74-3.97, P<0.001), and lymph node metastasis (OR=2.57, 95 % CI=1.57-4.19, P<0.001). However, when age, sex, and tumor differentiation were considered, no obvious association was observed. This study provides a comprehensive examination of the literature available on the association of MTA1 overexpression with OS and some clinicopathological features in solid tumors. Meta-analysis results provide evidence that MTA1 may be a new indicator of poor cancer prognosis. Considering the limitations of the eligible studies, other large-scale prospective trials must be conducted to clarify the prognostic value of MTA1 in predicting cancer survival.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCohort StudiesHistone DeacetylasesHumansImmunohistochemistryNeoplasmsNeoplasm StagingPrognosisPublication BiasRepressor ProteinsTrans-ActivatorsBiomarkers, TumorHistone DeacetylasesMTA1 protein, humanRepressor ProteinsTrans-Activators

Identifiers

PMID24599674
OpenAlexW2009901196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.